Monday, October 19, 2020
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Define ‘minority’, says PIL in Meghalaya HC

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

New Delhi: A public interest litigation has been filed in the Meghalaya High Court seeking directions from the government to define ‘minority’ and frame guidelines for their identification at the state level, in a spirit of the provision of Article 29 and 30 of the Constitution of India and the judgment of the apex court in TMA Pai case.

The petition has been filed by Delina Khongdup to secure fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 21, 29, and 30 of the Constitution for the benefit of poor, disabled, economically weaker sections and socially-economically downtrodden people, as they are incapable of accessing the Court themselves.

The petitioner states that the petition has been filed for the interpretation of the word “minority” as specified in Article 29 & 30 of the Constitution, keeping in view the federal form of government in our country and for direction to respondents to identify and notify minority under the NCM Act 1992 on state wise basis in the spirit of the eleven judges Bench decision in TMA Pai case.


Khongdup states that the facts constituting a cause of action accrued on 23.10.1993 when the Central Government had notified minority in terms of Sec 2 (c) of the National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992, without declaring the Hindus and other indigenous religious communities such as NiamKhasi, NiamTynrai, Songsarek, etc in the State of Meghalaya as Minority and on every date thereafter as long as these religious communities are not declared minority in the state and also on 20.02.2020 when the Hon’ble Supreme Court in public interest litigation bearing Writ Petition (Civil) No.316/2020 has given liberty to approach the alternative Court for issues involved in this petition.

Read Also: Delay cannot be ground for transfer of case to another court, rules SC

The petition further sought to declare the Hindus (11.53%) and other indigenous religions of Meghalaya,like NiamKhasi, Niamtynrai, and Songsarek, which had been enumerated in census report of 2011 as other religions, consisting of only 8.71%to be as a minority on state wise basis in terms of the NCM Act 1992 and in light of the decision of the constitutional bench of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of TMA Pai Case [(2002) 8 SCC 481].

– India Legal Bureau

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

News Update

All you need to know about Corporate Law

A corporate is a body or collection of people that have joined together to do business. Usually corporate are companies. Corporates are considered as artificial persons and legal fictions as they are bestowed with the recognition of persons, for their ease of operation.

Student denied admission in govt school due to age, moves Delhi High Court

New Delhi (ILNS): A petition has been filed in the Delhi High Court by a student who has been refused admission to Class XI of Government Sarvodaya Bal Vidyalaya, allegedly on the ground that he exceeded the age limit.

Cannot deny services in absence of Aarogya Setu App, says Karnataka High Court

New Delhi (ILNS): The Karnataka High Court today ordered that in the absence of a law, central and state government agencies cannot deny any benefit to citizens if they don’t install Aarogya Setu App.

Bombay High Court asks Mumbai Police to summon Arnab Goswami if it wants to add his name in FIR as accused in TRP case

New Delhi (ILNS): The Bombay High Court today asked the Mumbai Police to issue summons to Republic TV editor-in-chief Arnab Goswami if the police intend to add his name to the FIR as an accused.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.