31 C
Noida
Saturday, September 19, 2020
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Kerala HC Dismisses Plea for Fir Against State CM for Scams

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

The Kerala High Court on Wednesday (July 22) dismissed a petition seeking the registration of an FIR against Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijiyan and his former secretary-in-charge M Shivashankaran, for their alleged involvement in scams such as the Sprinklr deal scam, BevQ App. e-Mobility Consultancy scams and the gold smuggling case.

The petition was filed by Alappuzha-based journalist Michael Varghese. In the plea he had also sought a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) or a National Investigation Agency (NIA) probe into the aforesaid scams.

The division bench of the Chief Justice S. Manikumar and Justice Shaji P. Chaly held that the petitioner had failed to produce sufficient evidence to support the allegations. In this regard, the court observed: “The petitioner has solely relied on the statement of the Leader of the Opposition and contended that if it is true, the matter requires investigation. As such, he has no evidence or material, and that is why he has prayed for an interim direction…”

The court also highlighted that the petitioner has alternative remedies if the police had not lodged an FIR in a case. These remedies include approaching the jurisdictional magistrate under Section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), or filing a private complaint under Section 190 read with Section 200, CrPC. “Without resorting to the procedure as contemplated in the Cr.P.C, the petitioner has approached this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India”, the Bench observed.

“Merely because allegations are levelled against the Hon’ble Chief Minister and others and in as much as the allegations relate to abuse of power, it cannot be contended that the nature and magnitude require issuance of a writ as the only remedy available to the petitioner,” the bench said.

After recording detailed arguments made in the matter by the petitioner, the State, the NIA and the Central Government (Customs), the Writ Petition was dismissed. observing, “…judged from any angle, we are of the view, petitioner has not made out a case for issuance of a writ of mandamus. In the result, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs.”

Read the Judgment here;

Michael-Varghese-v-Pinarayi-Vijayan-and-ors-Judgment

– India Legal Bureau

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

News Update

PIL filed in SC seeking uniform ground of succession and inheritance

A Public Interest Litigation has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking removal of anomalies in the ground of succession and inheritance...

War of Words

Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla’s directive to chairpersons of parliamentary panels not to take up issues for examination which are pending in...

NCB: Another Sledgehammer?

Ever since the arrest of Rhea Chakraborty by this narcotics agency, curiosity has mounted about its role, powers and use as another...

BCI writes to Madras High Court CJ, judges asking for a recall of rules set for designating Senior Advocates

New Delhi: The Bar Council of India (BCI) yesterday wrote to the Chief Justice and his companion judges of Madras High Court...

Laws related to drug abuse

A comparison of Indian laws versus European, American, and Middle Eastern regarding punishment of marijuana users and pushers and sellers shows startling...
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.