Saturday, September 18, 2021
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Lal Gumbad: Delhi High Court asks ASI, DDA to rid pre-Mughal monument of encroachments

The Bench was not inclined to allow the matter without impleadment of owners/occupiers who are alleged to have raised illegal super-structures around the said monument.

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday asked the Archaeological Survey of India and the Delhi Development Authority to treat a plea seeking the preservation of Lal Gumbad, a pre-Mughal era protected monument, as a representation. The monument lies near Malviya Nagar area in the capital. 

The Division Bench comprising Chief Justice D.N. Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh disposed of the plea filed by one Sudhir Gupta alleging illegal encroachment and construction around the vicinity of the monument. The Bench was not inclined to allow the matter without impleadment of owners/occupiers who are alleged to have raised illegal super-structures around the said monument.  

The Bench held thus:

“The basic grievance ventilated in the petition is about the removal of the encroachment and preservation of monument Lal Gumbad on Field No. 84 of Sarai Shahji Village, New Delhi, as it stood in the year 1918…. It appears that without joining the persons who are owners/occupiers of the so-called illegal construction, the present petition has been preferred. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to give specific direction to the respondents to remove or demolish the particular construction.” 

Nonetheless, the Bench asked the concerned respondent authorities to treat the petition as a representation and decide the same after giving an effective remedy of being heard to the affected parties, as expeditiously as possible and practicable.

Also Read: Delhi High Court issues notice to Centre, ECI on plea seeking to declare offer of cash transfer in election manifestos as corrupt practice

“We also direct the concerned respondent authorities to remove the illegal encroachment, if any. The concerned respondent authorities before removal of the encroachment, shall give an effective opportunity of being heard to the owners/ occupiers of the super-structures which in opinion of the respondents are required to be removed,”

-the Bench added. 

Filed through Advocate Arjun Mitra, the plea seeks calling of the records pertaining to the notification by which Lal Gumbad was declared to be an ancient monument; and a direction to ensure that all encroachments in respect of the monument are removed in accordance with law. 

The plea further seeks a direction to ensure that due action is taken in accordance with law, in respect of constructions that have come up around the monument and have the same removed.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

News Update

NGT directs stoppage of Baitarani river project work of sand filling, embankment, retention wall

According to the order 8 applicants are seeking a direction to the respondents restraining them from the sand filling work of the river basin of Baitarani on the South Bank at the place where river Baitarani bifurcates as Old Baitarani and New Baitarani in the Bhadrak District of Odisha.

Allahabad High Court recalls order listing case of errant advocate before another bench

The Allahabad High Court has recently recalled its order in which it had directed the listing of a matter before another bench citing the "mischievous behaviour of the advocate".

CBI seeks dismissal of petition for separating Director of Prosecution from agency, says post enjoys full autonomy in affidavit

The Central Bureau of Investigation has informed the Delhi High Court that the Directorate of Prosecution has got full autonomy and there is no interference in the functioning of a law officer and it has no decision-making power in the appointment of the Director of Prosecution.

Supreme Court allows appeal against summons issued to invoke power under Section 319 CrPC

The Supreme Court has set aside the summons passed by the Sessions Judge, Khiri saying the Sessions Judge will apply his mind in the light of principles laid down by the Constitution Bench.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.