Sunday, September 19, 2021
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Madhya Pradesh HC tells authorities to decide representation of petitioner within 3 months

Prashant Singh Kaurav, Counsel for the Petitioners, submitted yesterday that Surendra Singh Tomar and others are the employee of the Horticulture Department and providing service on the post of Senior Horticulture Development Officer.

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has directed the concerned authorities to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of three months seeking grant of benefit of the third-time pay scale to the petitioners on completion of 30 years of service and to pay the differential amount of salary along with interest.

Prashant Singh Kaurav, Counsel for the Petitioners, submitted yesterday that Surendra Singh Tomar and others are the employee of the Horticulture Department and providing service on the post of Senior Horticulture Development Officer.

The petitioners got appointed in the department on October 28, 1989 and November 17, 1989. Benefit of first time pay scale was extended to the Petitioners and thereafter, benefit of second time pay scale was extended to petitioners w.e.f. 30.11.2009. The Petitioners became eligible for the benefit of third time pay scale , claimed the Counsel.

It was alleged that similarly situated persons were considered and benefit of third time pay scale was extended , PB 3-15600-39100+6600 Grade Pay. As the petitioners are eligible and have completed the period of 30 years, despite of which, benefit of third time pay scale has not been provided to the Petitioners.

Govt. Advocate for the State has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by the Counsel for the Petitioners. If fresh representation is filed by the petitioners, the same shall be decided as early as possible.

Read Also: Snatched Away Too Soon

A Single Bench of Justice Vishal Mishra onsidering the overall facts and circumstances of the case , dispose the Petition with a direction to the Petitioners to submit a fresh detailed representation alongwith all the relevant documents within a period of seven working days to the Concerned Authorities and in turn the Concerned Authorities “is directed to dwell upon the representation submitted by the petitioners and decide the same within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order”, the order read. 

Source: ILNS

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

News Update

NGT directs stoppage of Baitarani river project work of sand filling, embankment, retention wall

According to the order 8 applicants are seeking a direction to the respondents restraining them from the sand filling work of the river basin of Baitarani on the South Bank at the place where river Baitarani bifurcates as Old Baitarani and New Baitarani in the Bhadrak District of Odisha.

Allahabad High Court recalls order listing case of errant advocate before another bench

The Allahabad High Court has recently recalled its order in which it had directed the listing of a matter before another bench citing the "mischievous behaviour of the advocate".

CBI seeks dismissal of petition for separating Director of Prosecution from agency, says post enjoys full autonomy in affidavit

The Central Bureau of Investigation has informed the Delhi High Court that the Directorate of Prosecution has got full autonomy and there is no interference in the functioning of a law officer and it has no decision-making power in the appointment of the Director of Prosecution.

Supreme Court allows appeal against summons issued to invoke power under Section 319 CrPC

The Supreme Court has set aside the summons passed by the Sessions Judge, Khiri saying the Sessions Judge will apply his mind in the light of principles laid down by the Constitution Bench.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.