Courts

In its Chargesheet, the Delhi Police named Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Faizan Khan, Danish, Parvez, Ilyas, Khalid Saifi, Ishrat Jahan, Tahir Hussain, Meeran Haider, Pinjda Tod activists Gulfisha Fatima, Safoora Zargar, Natasha Narwal and Devangana Kalita, as accused of 'criminal conspiracy'.

The petitioner has challenged how the city of Mirzapur has been displayed as being full of terror, crime, and other illegal activities in the fictional series which after all maligns the image as the city of Uttar Pradesh.

Senior Advocate Siddhartha Luthra, appearing for Ragini, had submitted that there was not a single recovery of contraband. He said there was no evidence of consumption of a commercial quantity.

The Supreme Court adjourned hearing on the challenge to the Constitutional Validity of Maharashtra’s Socially and Educationally Backward Classes Act 2018, which grants reservation to Maratha Communi...

The Supreme Court has refused to deal with the petition filed by Dumpala Ramreddy, seeking directions to protect the inmates of Ashrams started by fake babas in the country from spreading of COVID 19...

A Delhi Court on Tuesday has extended the Judicial Custody of former JNU students leaders Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, former AAP councillor Tahir Hussain and others accused in the Delhi Riots case, t...

A three-judge bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy & M. R. Shah has said, the petitioner being a rape victim deserves treatment as rape victim by all the authorities. A rape victim suffers not only a mental trauma but also discrimination from the society, observed the Court in its order.

The Supreme Court has given a green signal to the proposed project on NH45-A Villuppuram-Nagapattinam Highway while stating that there is no requirement for obtaining Environmental Clearances

A three-judge bench headed by the Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justices AS Bopanna & V Ramasubramanian heard the matter through video conferencing.

The Supreme Court today on Wednesday dismissed the review petition challenging the Constitutionality of Aadhaar Act by a majority of 4:1. The dissenting judgment was given by Justice DY Chandrachud