Wednesday, September 22, 2021
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Amaravati land case: Supreme Court adjourns hearing to July 22, Andhra wants probe to continue

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday adjourned the hearing in a petition filed by the Andhra Pradesh Government challenging the High Court order staying a probe into the case registered against a former advocate general and others for alleged irregularities in the Amaravati land distribution during the erstwhile TDP regime of N. Chandrababu Naidu.

The division bench of Justice Vineet Saran and Justice Dinesh Maheshwari adjourned the hearing to July 22. During the hearing, the Court said, “To hear the application, we will have to hear the matter to some extent.”

In this matter, last year, the Andhra Pradesh High Court had issued interim orders on an application filed by Dammalapati Srinivas hours after the State Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) filed a case against him and 12 others for alleged insider trading in Amaravati under the Prevention of Corruption Act and sections of the IPC.

The State Government had thereafter decided to move the Supreme Court challenging the High Court’s interim orders, staying a further probe in a case registered against Srinivas, a former advocate general, and 12 others in the Amaravati land scam and gagging the media from reporting on contents of the FIR against the accused.

Rajeev Dhavan, Senior Counsel for the State of Andhra Pradesh, submitted, “I have gone through the entire case law on this… The Supreme Court has never stopped an investigation before. This petition is a vengeance petition of a lost election. What I was suggesting, I am not in a position to say that it should be heard here. On instructions, I am told that it should be heard in the HC, at length. If it is against an interim order, all I can press for is that no coercive action is taken.”

Also Read: Sedition: Media foundation files intervention application in Supreme Court on constitutional validity of IPC 124-A

Dhavan further submitted, “After that, it immediately projected on Social Media. I don’t want to indicate who these judges are but I don’t want to add another dimension to this case. Therefore, let the investigation proceed. We had asked the CBI to come in. I really don’t want to extend the process. All facts will come out.”

Referring to the judgment in question, the Senior Counsel said that after the filing of the writ petition, a learned judge of the Court refused a hearing and directed the Registry to list the matter before another judge. The FIR was then registered giving it a political colour.

Harish Salve, Senior Counsel for former Advocate General Dammalapati Srinivas, said, “If he is pressing the SLP, then let it be heard. Otherwise, let the SLP be dismissed and the matter be heard by the High Court. He can’t have it both ways.” 

The matter is now to be heard on July 22.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

News Update

Why aren’t international institutions so easily accessible to Indian lawyers, professors: Justice P.S. Narasimha

The Indian Society of International Law (ISIL) on Wednesday inaugurated its Post Graduation Diploma Courses for 2021-22 and also, the Convocation ceremony for its 2019-20 and 2020-21 batches.

Delhi High Court directs Delhi govt, IHBAS to explain why they didn’t constitute state mental health authority

A single-judge Delhi High Court bench was hearing a plea to set up the State Mental Health Authority (‘SMHA’) and the Mental Health Review Board (‘MHRB’) for Delhi in compliance with the obligations under the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017.

Rs 50,000 per Covid death: NDMA recommends ex-gratia payment in affidavit to Supreme Court

Center said in an affidavit in the Supreme Court that the NDMA has recommended an amount of Rs 50,000 each as ex-gratia payment to covid-19 deceased families. The Affidavit, was filed by Govind Mohan, Additional Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, was in response to Supreme Court directions.

Supreme Court reserves verdict on plea seeking free education to every child with special needs, disabled children

The Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved its judgment on a petition seeking directions to ensure free and compulsory education to each and every Child With Special Need (CWSN)/Disabled Children by initiating the process of appointment of Special Teachers as per the Teacher Pupil ratio, which is 1:5.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.