Tuesday, June 22, 2021
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

SC gives last chance to Madhya Pradesh DGP to arrest BSP MLA’s husband accused in Congress leader’s murder

The MP DGP had filed an affidavit that despite efforts, police have not been able to apprehend and arrest the accused.

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

The Supreme Court on Friday pulled up the Madhya Pradesh Director General of Police (DGP) for his failure to comply with its March 12 order to arrest BSP MLA Rambai Prajapati’s husband Govind Singh. Singh is accused of the 2019 murder of Congress leader Devendra Chaurasia in Damoh, Madhya Pradesh. The Court has listed the matter for further hearing on April 5, 2021.

The bench of Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah noted that despite clear directions in the March 12 order, the Madhya Pradesh police have not been able to apprehend and arrest the accused. The MP DGP had filed an affidavit that despite efforts, police have not been able to apprehend and arrest the accused.

The apex court termed the affidavit filed by MP DGP completely “unacceptable”.  “It defies reasons as to how an accused, who is the spouse of a sitting Member of the Legislative Assembly has not been arrested despite being arraigned in pursuance of the provisions of section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 to face trial for an offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code 1860,” said the bench.

The Apex Court also noted that the accused was even given police security which has now been withdrawn as per the affidavit of the DGP. The court has given a final opportunity to the state’s DG to comply with the previous order of the court failing which the court will take coercive steps in accordance with the law. Further, the court has directed DG Police to file additional affidavit setting out;

A) The date on which and the cause on the basis of which security was granted to the accused;

B) Whether the security continues to be provided as of the date; and

C) If not, the date on which the security was withdrawn.

In a petition filed by the Devendra Chaurasia’s son Somesh Chaurasia, the top court had on March 12, directed the MP DGP to arrest the accused. The Court had noted that the facts of the case indicate that despite the registration of an FIR on March 15, 2019, wherein Chaurasia’s son Somesh has alleged that Govind Singh was complicit in the murder of his father, no steps have been taken by the investigating authorities to arrest him.

The Court in its previous order of March 12, had also taken note of the alleged harassment of a judicial officer by the Damoh SP and asked the DGP to inquire into allegations leveled by the additional sessions judge. The ASJ had arrayed Govind Singh as an accused under Section 319 (power to proceed against other persons appearing to be guilty of an offence) of the CrPC.

The Court noted, “The order of the additional Judge furnishes reasons for taking steps in pursuance of the provisions of Section 319 to arraign the second respondent as an accused. The additional session judge notes that though he was taking action in compliance with the directions issued by this court for ensuring service of the second respondent, he was being obstructed.”

The ASJ in its order date January 8, 2021, had claimed the accused “were leveling false allegations against him, adding that he had applied for a transfer from the case as well, which was dismissed by the district judge. He had also noted that he is being pressurized by the SP Damoh and his subordinates.”

The Supreme Court had noted in its order,

“We take serious note of the manner in which the Additional Sessions Judge, Hata who is in charge of the criminal case has been harassed by the law enforcement machinery in Damoh. We have no reason to disbelieve a judicial officer who has made an impassioned plea that he was being pressurized as a result of his orders under Section 319 of the CrPC. The State which had moved the High Court for cancellation of the bail which was granted to the second respondent as an incident of the suspension of sentence on 3 February 2016, has failed to apprehend the second respondent who continues to evade arrest. A warrant of arrest was issued against the second respondent.”

Read Also: Kerala HC directs officer to solemnize marriage of foreign citizen

Apart from arresting the second respondent and report compliance, the Court had also directed the DGP to enquire into the allegations levelled by the second respondent against the Superintendent of Police Damoh by the Additional Sessions Judge in his order dated 8 February 2021, noted above, said the Court.  The Court had directed to provide adequate security to R.P. Sonkar, 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Hata, District Damoh.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

News Update

Supreme Court reserves verdict on plea seeking ex-gratia payment of Rs 4 lakh each to families of Covid deceased

The Division Bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice M R Shah have asked both parties to file their written submissions within 3 days.

Uttarakhand HC directs Haridwar DM to decide on widow’s licence plea

The Single-Judge Bench of Justice Manoj Kumar Tewari, after hearing the submission from the respective parties on Friday, disposed of the plea with liberty to the woman to make an application for a grant of fresh license for a petty diesel retail outlet.

Himachal Pradesh High Court quashes Shimla civic body claim against NGT order

In such circumstances, the bench failed to appreciate as to how the plan/map submitted by the petitioners for reconstruction/carrying out major repair work of the building for commercial purpose could have been rejected.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.