Sunday, September 19, 2021
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Supreme Court puts out draft rules for live streaming, recording of proceedings released

Justice Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Supreme Court Judge and Chairperson of the e-committee, has written to all high court chief justices, calling for inputs and suggestions on the Draft Model Rules for Live-Streaming and Recording of Court Proceedings. He mentions in the letter that the right of access to justice, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution encompasses the right to access live court proceedings.

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

The Supreme Court’s e-Committee has released the Draft Model Rules for live-streaming and recording of court proceedings. According to a press release, the Department of Justice, Government of India, and e-Committee of the Supreme Court is working under the National Policy and Action Plan for implementation of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in the Indian judiciary.

Justice Dr Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Supreme Court Judge and Chairperson of the e-Committee, has written to all high court chief justices, calling for inputs and suggestions on the Draft Model Rules for Live-Streaming and Recording of Court Proceedings. He mentions in the letter that the right of access to justice, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution encompasses the right to access live court proceedings.

“To imbue greater transparency, inclusivity and foster access to justice, the e-Committee has undertaken the project of live streaming of court proceedings on priority. This will enable access to live court proceedings, including on matters of public interest to citizens, journalists, civil society, academicians and law students on a real time basis, which was not otherwise possible owing to geographical, logistical or infrastructural issues,” reads the press release.

A sub-committee consisting of judges of the Bombay, Delhi, Madras and Karnataka High Courts was constituted to frame model live streaming rules. The sub-committee has held extensive deliberations. It took into account the principles enunciated in the decision of the top court in Swapnil Tripathi v Supreme Court of India,(2018) 10 SCC 639 including the concerns of privacy and confidentiality of litigants and witnesses, matters relating to business confidentiality, prohibition or restriction of access to proceedings or trials stipulated by Central or State legislation and in some cases to preserve the larger public interest owing to the sensitivity of the case.

Read Also: Delhi High Court issues notice on plea challenging order that allowed private schools to collect annual charges, development fees

These model rules provide a balanced regulatory framework for live streaming and recording of court proceedings. Suggestions and inputs on the Draft Model Rules for Live-Streaming and Recording of Court Proceedings are invited on or before June 30.

Source: ILNS

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

News Update

NGT directs stoppage of Baitarani river project work of sand filling, embankment, retention wall

According to the order 8 applicants are seeking a direction to the respondents restraining them from the sand filling work of the river basin of Baitarani on the South Bank at the place where river Baitarani bifurcates as Old Baitarani and New Baitarani in the Bhadrak District of Odisha.

Allahabad High Court recalls order listing case of errant advocate before another bench

The Allahabad High Court has recently recalled its order in which it had directed the listing of a matter before another bench citing the "mischievous behaviour of the advocate".

CBI seeks dismissal of petition for separating Director of Prosecution from agency, says post enjoys full autonomy in affidavit

The Central Bureau of Investigation has informed the Delhi High Court that the Directorate of Prosecution has got full autonomy and there is no interference in the functioning of a law officer and it has no decision-making power in the appointment of the Director of Prosecution.

Supreme Court allows appeal against summons issued to invoke power under Section 319 CrPC

The Supreme Court has set aside the summons passed by the Sessions Judge, Khiri saying the Sessions Judge will apply his mind in the light of principles laid down by the Constitution Bench.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.