Tuesday, June 22, 2021
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Supreme Court rejects plea of solar scam accused Saritha S Nair against Ernakulam MP Hibi Eden

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected the plea of Saritha S. Nair, the accused in the solar scam, seeking cancellation of the election of Ernakulam MP Hibi Eden.

The three-judge bench of Chief Justice S. A. Bobde , Justice A. S. Bopanna and Justice V. Ramasubramanian rejected the petition.

Nair had also submitted her nomination to contest the Lok Sabha polls from Ernakulam constituency. However, as she was convicted in a criminal case for more than two years, the returning officer had rejected the nomination. The petitioner had approached the Kerala High Court challenging this decision but the HC dismissed her petition. Following that, she filed a plea in the Apex Court.

The Court observed, “The procedure adopted by the High Court of Kerala cannot be approved. The High Court was wrong in thinking that the defective verification of the election petition was a pointer to the game plan of the election petitioner to disown the pleadings at a later stage, especially after making serious allegations against the former Chief Minister. If only the High Court had given an opportunity to the petitioner to cure the defects in the verification and if, despite such an opportunity, the petitioner had failed to come up with a proper verification, the High Court could have then held the petitioner guilty of playing hide and seek. The failure of the High Court to give an opportunity to cure the defects is improper.”

“The date of conviction is what determines the date of commencement of the period of disqualification. However, it is date of release which determines the date on which the disqualification will cease to have effect,” held the High Court.

“Therefore, we hold that the petitioner was disqualified from  contesting the elections in terms of  Section 8(3) of the Act. In
such circumstances, she could not have maintained an election
petition as  “a candidate at such election” in terms of Section 81(1). Therefore, the  High Court was right in not venturing into an exercise in futility, by taking up the election petition for trial, though the High Court was wrong in rejecting the election petition
on the ground of existence of incurable of defects,” the judgment reads in conclusion.

Also Read: Supreme Court sets aside Rajasthan HC order overturning accident claims award, enhances it

During the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, the returning officers had rejected Saritha Nair’s nomination papers filed in Wayanad and Ernakulam constituencies. Saritha had approached the apex court challenging Rahul Gandhi’s victory from Wayanad Lok Sabha constituency. However, a bench led by Chief Justice S A Bobde had dismissed that plea.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

News Update

Supreme Court reserves verdict on plea seeking ex-gratia payment of Rs 4 lakh each to families of Covid deceased

The Division Bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice M R Shah have asked both parties to file their written submissions within 3 days.

Uttarakhand HC directs Haridwar DM to decide on widow’s licence plea

The Single-Judge Bench of Justice Manoj Kumar Tewari, after hearing the submission from the respective parties on Friday, disposed of the plea with liberty to the woman to make an application for a grant of fresh license for a petty diesel retail outlet.

Himachal Pradesh High Court quashes Shimla civic body claim against NGT order

In such circumstances, the bench failed to appreciate as to how the plan/map submitted by the petitioners for reconstruction/carrying out major repair work of the building for commercial purpose could have been rejected.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.