Monday, November 29, 2021
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Hoteliers Cry Foul as OYO, Post COVID19, Cites “Force Majeure” To Suspend Payments

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

OYO has suspended payment of minimum assured amount to the hotels, invoking ‘force majeure’ clause in their agreement in view of the effect of COVID-19 pandemic on its revenues. Under the earlier agreement policy OYO used to pay a minimum amount to the hotels regardless of the business generated by the hotels.

OYO has proposed new revenue-sharing models, while invoking force majeure. However, most of the hotel owners are not happy with the decision of the company and alleged that such clause was never included in the original agreement. The Economic Times quoted a hotel owner saying “How can the ‘force majeure’ clause be invoked if there wasn’t any such clause in the agreement that we signed with them? When sales were booming, they never gave us the due amount.”

OYO in turn has argued that if the situation gets even more critical,  the company reserves the the right to completely terminate such arrangements, as they will not be able to make the payments when the hotels will be used for essential services as ordered by the government.

The concept of ‘Force Majeure’ came into existence in the case of Taylor vs. Caldwell, (1861-73) All ER Rep 24, in which it was held that if some unpredicted event occurs during the term or performance of the contract that makes the performance of the contract impossible, it may not be performed any further as it would be unjust.

Similarly, when Ebola pandemic affected the world, mainly affecting the West Africa, the courts observed that the event is a ‘force majeure’.

A situation of pandemic like COVID-19 may also in certain situations qualify for ‘force majeure’ as in the case of Satyabrata Ghose vs. Mugneeram Bangur & Vo., 1954 SCR 310[12], the Supreme Court of India observed that in the Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1852 “…the word “impossible” has not been used here in the sense of physical or literal impossibility. The performance of an act may not be literally impossible but it may be impracticable and useless from the point of view of the object and purpose which the parties had in view and if an untoward event or change of circumstances totally upset the very foundation upon which the parties rested their bargain…” 

‘Force Majeure’ comes into effect when there is some unforeseen calamity that may include natural disaster and manmade emergencies. However, the clause is very common in contracts and allows the parties to waive their liability during some unforeseeable and extraordinary event. Years back in 2015 spread of Ebola pandemic has been claimed to qualify as ‘force majeure’.

-Gautam Mishra

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.



News Update

Supreme Court dismisses Richa Dubey plea to quash FIR, gives 7 days to surrender; directs High Court to hear her bail plea at the earliest

The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed the petition of Richa Dubey, wife of main accused Vikas Dubey in Kanpur Bikru case where she sought quashing of the FIR lodged against her. However, the court allowed Richa Dubey to file a bail petition after surrendering; giving seven days time to surrender.

Supreme Court issues notice in petition seeking food security for all refugees, asylum seekers, particularly those in settlements

In matter of National Food Security Act Supreme Court observed that though the COVID problems are over, however, issued notice to the centre and other states wherein a number of refugees and asylum seekers who are residing in different settlements are gravely affected due to the COVID19.

New guidelines for international arrivals: From 7-day home quarantine to mandatory negative RT-PCR test | FAQ answered

Meanwhile, India reported 8,309 new coronavirus cases and 236 deaths in the last 24 hours.

Supreme Court asks DMRC to take clearance from Chief Conservator of Forests, Environment Ministry for its fourth phase

The Supreme Court on Monday while giving the verdict regarding the construction of the fourth phase of DMRC (Delhi Metro Rail Corporation) said DMRC will have to take the permission of the Chief Conservator of Forests and the Environment Ministry regarding the issue of trees for the construction of the fourth phase of the metro project. The Supreme Court had reserved its order November 11after hearing the petition of DMRC.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.