Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Another Interlocutory Application has been allowed by the Supreme Court to be included into the main application in the Vivek Narayan Sharma versus Union of India case which deals with the events during demonetisation and if one critical government notification – of November 8, 2016 – on that fateful day was ultra vires of Section 26(2) and Sections 7, 17, 23, 24, 29 and 42 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 and other legal tenets.

The apex court bench of Justice L Nageswara Rao on Wednesday (March 28) in its order noted that the IA filed by the petitioner is to be listed and heard along with the main matter which is before the constitutional bench.

The petition is also asks that assuming that the notification has been validly issued under the RBI Act, 1934, whether it is ultra vires to Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution; whether the limit on withdrawal of cash from the funds deposited in bank accounts has no basis in law and violates Articles 14,19 and 21; whether the implementation of the impugned notification(s) suffers from procedural and/or substantive unreasonableness and thereby violates Articles 14 and 19 and, if so, to what effect?

The petition also asks that in the event that Section 26(2) is held to permit demonetization, does it suffer from excessive delegation of legislative power thereby rendering it ultra vires the Constitution? It also asks what the scope of judicial review is in matters relating to fiscal and economic policy of the government.

It asks whether a petition by a political party on the issues raised is maintainable under Article 32; and Whether District Co-operative Banks have been discriminated against by excluding them from accepting deposits and exchanging demonetized notes.

– India Legal Bureau

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.


  1. Two years had passed after demonization .no news when the petitions referred to constitutional tytbench of Honble Supreme Court will start hearing the case. In the meanwhile as per RBI statement about 94% of the total 500 and 1000 rupee notes had come back. Only about 6% 500&1000 notes had not come back. Majority of the remaining notes will be with persons who had not known about this and with persons who were out of the country Hence my opinion is govt. itself can give one more opportunity to deposit the amount in banks with a rider that it cannot be withdrawn for fixed tenure. This will help aged persons who had unknowingly not deposited the 500&1000 notes within the time allowed due to ignorance.

Comments are closed.