Sunday, September 19, 2021
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Delhi High Court seeks Delhi Government stand in another plea against New Excise Policy

At the outset, the new Excise Policy was introduced by the Delhi Government in June this year and was made available in the public domain on July 5, 2021. The said policy divided Delhi into 32 zones, comprising 27 liquor vends each, for the purpose of issuance of licenses.

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

The Delhi High Court has today sought a response from the Delhi Government in a plea challenging various amendments brought about by it in the New Excise Policy for 2021-2022. The matter was listed before the bench comprising Chief Justice D.N. Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh.

The plea has been filed through Advocate Vijay Sharma by All India Bhrashtachar Virodhi Morcha, a registered NGO. At the outset, the new Excise Policy was introduced by the Delhi Government in June this year and was made available in the public domain on July 5, 2021. The said policy divided Delhi into 32 zones, comprising 27 liquor vends each, for the purpose of issuance of licenses. 

On June 28, 2021, the Delhi Government floated a tender, inviting e-bids for grant of 32 zonal retail licenses for the year 2021-22 through e-tendering process for the sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor in the region of NCT of Delhi, on the basis of the newly approved policy.

The plea avers the petitioner organization filed an RTI application asking for information on the new excise policy. Subsequently, on July 12’ 2021, the petitioner organization made a representation against the new policy, however, no action has been taken on his representation as yet. 

The plea seeks to quash of the provision relating to a reduction in the age for consumption of liquor, as also the provision which mentions the sale of foreign liquor and Indian-made foreign liquor only through privately-owned vends and not through Government-owned vends.

Also Read: 2011 Bhanwari Devi murder case: Supreme Court grants bail to Congress leader, says can’t keep a person in custody for an indefinite period of time

The plea states thus: “The petitioner is working in the society at the grassroot level and there is an opinion among a lot of people hat reducing the age for consumption of liquor is going to increase alcoholism amongst students  and younger generation of the society and the closure of the Government vends is a decision which is not in the public interest.”

The Bench issued notice and slated the matter for hearing on September 17. 

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

News Update

Supreme Court refuses relief to NLSIU student who wasn’t promoted due to uncleared exams

A two-judge bench of Supreme Court said “How long you want that courts should run the institutions/universities and why should we interfere?” While relying to the contentions of the petitioners counsel to promote her to final year by way of an opportunity.

NGT directs stoppage of Baitarani river project work of sand filling, embankment, retention wall

According to the order 8 applicants are seeking a direction to the respondents restraining them from the sand filling work of the river basin of Baitarani on the South Bank at the place where river Baitarani bifurcates as Old Baitarani and New Baitarani in the Bhadrak District of Odisha.

Allahabad High Court recalls order listing case of errant advocate before another bench

The Allahabad High Court has recently recalled its order in which it had directed the listing of a matter before another bench citing the "mischievous behaviour of the advocate".

CBI seeks dismissal of petition for separating Director of Prosecution from agency, says post enjoys full autonomy in affidavit

The Central Bureau of Investigation has informed the Delhi High Court that the Directorate of Prosecution has got full autonomy and there is no interference in the functioning of a law officer and it has no decision-making power in the appointment of the Director of Prosecution.

Supreme Court allows appeal against summons issued to invoke power under Section 319 CrPC

The Supreme Court has set aside the summons passed by the Sessions Judge, Khiri saying the Sessions Judge will apply his mind in the light of principles laid down by the Constitution Bench.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.