Tuesday, April 20, 2021
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Madhya Pradesh HC directs Hoshangabad Collector to act against illegally built banquet halls

The PIL was filed by Krishna Gopal Choukdey, A. Rameshan and Brij Kishore Jatav seeking direction against the respondents No.4 and 5 (Private Respondent), who have built their marriage garden in an illegal manner.

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

The Jabalpur Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court directed the Collector, Hoshangabad, to decide the representation against illegal construction of marriage garden in two months while disposing of a PIL.

The PIL was filed by Krishna Gopal Choukdey, A. Rameshan and Brij Kishore Jatav seeking direction against the respondents No.4 and 5 (Private Respondent), who have built their marriage garden in an illegal manner.

According to the petition, respondent No. 4 and 5 have applied for conversion of the land bearing Khasra No.107/11 ad-measuring 1.137 hectares out of which 1.00 acres of land was applied for conversion for commercial purposes on 21.12.2015. The Sub Divisional Officer (SDO) invited objections to the application and finally vide order dated 26.3.2016 respondents application was rejected on the ground that the land in question falls in a submergence area of a dam.

Being aggrieved by the order dated 26.3.2016 the respondents No.4 and 5 preferred an appeal before the Court of Additional Collector, Hoshangabad, who vide order dated 24.8.2016 set aside the order of the SDO and the conversion of the land for commercial purpose was allowed and directed the Revenue Inspector to decide the rent as per the provisions contained in Section 172(3)(gha) of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959. In compliance of the order dated 24.8.2016, the Revenue Inspector decided the rent. Thereafter the respondents No.4 and 5 started construction over the land in question and while raising such construction no permission was taken from the Government authorities, the Petition said.

It was alleged in the PIL, that the respondents No.4 and 5 have even vandalized the Government property i.e. railing of the N.H.69, to make way to their marriage garden without any permission. They have also obtained electricity connection over the land in question without taking any permission from the competent authority , informed by the Petitioner.

Read Also: Supreme Court defers hearing in child rape cases to next week

The Division Bench of Chief Justice Mohammad Rafiq and Justice Sanjay Dwivedi while considering the PIL has ordered that “this writ petition is disposed of requiring the petitioners to approach the Collector, Hoshangabad for redressal of their grievance by way of a representation, who shall decide the same after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioners as well as respondents No.4 and 5, within two months.”

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

News Update

Lockdown in Lucknow, Prayagraj, Varanasi, Gorakhpur, Kanpur: Allahabad HC says UP govt didn’t plan for the pandemic despite last year’s ou...

The Court has issued issued the following orders to the State authorities to be enforced in the cities of Prayagraj, Lucknow, Varanasi, Kanpur Nagar and Gorakhpur:

MP High Court Bar Association constitutes lawyers’ committee to distribute free ration to advocates

Keeping in view the rising number of Covid-19 cases, following which, the financial crisis being faced by the lawyers due to the closing of District Courts, the MPHCBA has decided to give ration to financially poor lawyers
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.