Tuesday, March 2, 2021
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Prohibiting those above 65 on film sets is discriminatory, rules Bombay HC

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

New Delhi: The Bombay High Court has quashed two government resolutions of the State of Maharashtra which prohibited actors above the age of 65 years from remaining on film sets as discriminatory.

The bench, comprising Justices SJ Kathawalla and RI Chagla were hearing a petition filed by 70-year-old actor Pramod Pandey, challenging guidelines issued by the Maharashtra government on May 30, and June 23 according to which no cast or crew member above the age of 65 years is allowed at film and television shooting sets, say reports reaching here.

On the previous hearing the bench had directed the state government to file an affidavit explaining the “data, statistics, or reports” for issuing the prohibitory orders.

Pandey argued that he was physically fit, but the state was restraining him from working based on his age.

The advocate appearing for the state government, however, submitted that the guidelines issued by the state government was not discriminatory since there were similar guidelines issued by the Central and state governments which restrained elderly people from stepping out except in case of exceptional circumstances.

The bench observed: “In our view, the impugned condition is not based on any intelligible differentia between the two identical classes of persons above the age of 65 years as set out above. Whilst there may be a nexus with the object sought to be achieved, i.e. to protect vulnerable people from the Covid-19 pandemic, there is no intelligible differentia between persons who are 65 years of age or above in the cast/crew of films and TV shootings on the one hand and persons who are 65 years of age or above in other sectors and services, permitted under prevailing lockdown orders.”

The bench further observed: “There is discrimination in the disparate treatment of persons who are 65 years of age or above in the film or television industry and in the other permitted sectors and permitted activities. The same is not based on any intelligible differentia and no explanation to this effect is to be found in the Reply of the State Government. The Impugned Condition therefore cannot be sustained in view of the well settled principles enunciated under Article 14 of the Constitution of India.”

Read Also: Rhea reaches ED office

The bench however clarified that the advisory applicable to persons above 65 years of age would apply to persons associated with the film industry.

Read the Judgment here;

O070820201601

– India Legal Bureau

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

News Update

Supreme Court asks Maharashtra govt servant accused of raping minor if he would marry her, grants him protection from arrest for 4 weeks

The Supreme Court on Monday while hearing the special leave petition of a Maharashtra government official, who is accused of raping a minor girl asked whether he was he was ready to marry the victim.

Delhi HC orders IHBAS to fill up vacancies for doctors, medical staff in 2 months

However, after the court noted that Centre has no role in recruitment of doctors at IHBAS, the court deleted it from the memo of parties.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.