Thursday, September 23, 2021
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Bombay High Court grants 4 weeks transit anticipatory bail to journalist Rana Ayyub in UP Police FIR over her tweet

The other accused in the FIR are news website The Wire along with Alt news co-founder Mohammed Zubair, Congress politicians Shama Mohamed, Salman Nizami and Maskoor Usmani.

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

The Bombay High Court on Monday granted 4 weeks transit anticipatory bail to journalist Rana Ayyub in the FIR registered by the Uttar Pradesh police over her tweet on the Ghaziabad incident relating to the assault of an elderly Muslim man.

The bench of Justice P.D. Naik ordered that protection could be granted to Rana Ayyub so that the journalist is able to approach the court to seek relief.

In the event of arrest during the period of four weeks, the applicant be released on executing a PR Bond of 25,000 with one or more sureties”, the bench ordered.

Senior Advocate Mihir Desai, who appeared for Ayyub, told the bench that she was a globally renowned journalist who has won several awards for her work and contended that she had only made a tweet based on news reports about the incident of the Muslim man being attacked.

When conflicting versions emerged about the incident, Desai said, Ayyub deleted the tweet. He also pointed out that all offences mentioned in the FIR are punishable with less than 3 years jail. The bench observed that since the applicant was only seeking protection to approach the jurisdictional court, adjudication of the application on merits was unnecessary.

Ayyub approached the court on June 18, two days after the UP police registered an FIR against her and eight others, including Twitter under sections 153 (provoking to cause riots), 153A (promoting enmity between religious groups), 295A (insulting religious beliefs), 505 (statements inducing public mischief) & 120B (punishment of criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code.

The other accused in the FIR are news website The Wire along with Alt news co-founder Mohammed Zubair, Congress politicians Shama Mohamed, Salman Nizami and Maskoor Usmani.

The UP police had also named Twitter in the FIR as it failed to take down the tweets and allegedly allowed the video to go viral. The FIR was registered in the backdrop of an elderly Muslim man’s claim in a video that his beard was cut off and he was forced to chant Vande Mataram and Jai Shri Ram.

However, later on, the Uttar Pradesh Police ruled out any “communal angle” and said that Sufi Abdul Samad, the elderly man, was attacked by six men, as they were unhappy over the tabeez (amulets) he had sold them.

Read Also: Kerala High Court frees man because he’s charged under wrong CrPC provision

The FIR alleges that the accused circulated the video of the incident on their Twitter handles without checking the authenticity of the video. The FIR also alleged that the accused have shared this video to give a communal angle to the incident with the intention to incite communal hatred between the religious communities and wanted to disturb the public order.

The FIR also states that the views expressed while sharing the videos weren’t individual opinions, rather they were shared with a clear intention, and the sharing of the video indicates a criminal conspiracy. And they intended to incite communal hatred between the Hindu and Muslim communities.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

News Update

Why aren’t international institutions so easily accessible to Indian lawyers, professors: Justice P.S. Narasimha

The Indian Society of International Law (ISIL) on Wednesday inaugurated its Post Graduation Diploma Courses for 2021-22 and also, the Convocation ceremony for its 2019-20 and 2020-21 batches.

Delhi High Court directs Delhi govt, IHBAS to explain why they didn’t constitute state mental health authority

A single-judge Delhi High Court bench was hearing a plea to set up the State Mental Health Authority (‘SMHA’) and the Mental Health Review Board (‘MHRB’) for Delhi in compliance with the obligations under the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017.

Rs 50,000 per Covid death: NDMA recommends ex-gratia payment in affidavit to Supreme Court

Center said in an affidavit in the Supreme Court that the NDMA has recommended an amount of Rs 50,000 each as ex-gratia payment to covid-19 deceased families. The Affidavit, was filed by Govind Mohan, Additional Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, was in response to Supreme Court directions.

Supreme Court reserves verdict on plea seeking free education to every child with special needs, disabled children

The Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved its judgment on a petition seeking directions to ensure free and compulsory education to each and every Child With Special Need (CWSN)/Disabled Children by initiating the process of appointment of Special Teachers as per the Teacher Pupil ratio, which is 1:5.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.