Saturday, May 15, 2021
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Supreme Court refuses to transfer CBI cases against former CPWD chief engineer, his wife

The Supreme Court said that though the Senior Counsel for the petitioner has contended that the witnesses remaining to be examined in the second case are scattered all over and not in the locality,

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

ILNS: The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to transfer two cases filed by the CBI against a septuagenarian couple from Darjeeling to New Delhi, saying that however sympathetic one maybe to the health condition of the accused, the other respondents cannot be put into trouble by transfer of the case.

While hearing a petition filed by retired CPWD Chief Engineer Devendra Kumar Saxena, the single-judge bench of Justice V. Ramasubramanian said even if the totality of the circumstances is taken into consideration, a transfer cannot be ordered.

The Bench said,

“It is true, as rightly contended by the Senior Counsel for the petitioner, that the right of the accused to a fair trial and a fair opportunity to defend himself against the charges will be meaningful, only when there is active participation of the accused in the proceedings. Though one may point out the availability of technology for effective communications between the client and the counsel, the same cannot replace the physical assistance that an accused may be able to render to the Defence counsel in a criminal proceeding.”

“But the same logic will apply equally to Respondent Nos 2 and 3 in the first case. If the petitioner is entitled to a fair trial, the Respondent Nos 2 and 3 are also equally entitled to a fair trial. I cannot ask Respondent Nos 2 and 3 in the first case to travel to Delhi and expect them to defend the case effectively,”

-added the Judge.

The Court also refused to transfer another case, in which the petitioner himself and his wife were only accused, saying that it is true that in the second case, there are no other co-­accused except the wife of the petitioner, but there is no point in ordering the transfer of one case and rejecting the prayer for transfer in the other case.

“However, the Trial Court shall take note of the health condition of the petitioner and dispense with his personal appearance, except when necessary. If online participation is permissible and the facility is also available, it is open to the Special Court to consider whether the petitioner can be allowed to participate virtually, so that he is not completely in the dark about what is happening,”

-the Bench said.

According to the petitioner, CBI had filed criminal cases against him and his wife under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and they had been tried before the Court of Special CBI Judge, Siliguri, Darjeeling, West Bengal.

The petitioner said he was now aged about 70 years and had already suffered a severe paralytic attack and brain stroke. He claimed that he was not in a position to move, walk, speak and perform his routine activities, without the help of an attendant.

CBI contended that charges had been framed against the petitioner(s) under Sections 120B IPC and Sections 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 in one case and under Sections 109 IPC read with Sections 13(2) and 13(1)(e) of the
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 in other case.

The national agency said that the accused retired from service on September 30, 2010. The FIR was lodged on September 30, 2010 in the first case and the final report was filed on June 30, 2011. It appears that there are 21 witnesses in the first case and out of them, none have been examined so far. FIR was lodged in the second case on January 5, 2011 and the final report was filed on May 31, 2012. A total of 115 witnesses are to be examined in the second case, out of whom 32 have already been examined.

Also Read: SC sets aside bail given to 6 murder accused, criticises Gujarat HC verdict

The Supreme Court said that though the Senior Counsel for the petitioner has contended that the witnesses remaining to be examined in the second case are scattered all over and not in the locality, “I do not think it is viable that after the examination of 32 witnesses, we should transfer the case”.

The case pertains to October 1, 2010, when CBI had arrested Saxena on graft charges, a day after he retired from the service. According to media reports, CBI conducted searches at the residences of the retired chief engineer in Delhi and Siliguri (West Bengal) and recovered unaccounted cash worth Rs 1.5 crore and incriminating documents. Saxena was posted in Siliguri and was responsible for ensuring flood-lighting work along the Indo-Bangla border.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

News Update

Peace Mediation – Legal Revolution 5.0

The fine distinction between Meditation and Mediation is the presence and absence of the letter 'T'. In meditation, the Self itself acts as the Third Party or the Teacher and guides Self to realise the true nature of Self. 'T' in mediation is the mediator.

Calcutta High Court directs authorities to inspect health, condition of mobile tower on senior citizen’s roof

The Calcutta High Court on May 12 , while disposing a Petition of a Senior Citizen , directed the Concerned Authorities to inspect the health and condition of the mobile tower installed on the roof of the building of the petitioner.

Allahabad High Court stays judicial officer’s FIR against Chief Medical Officer

The bench requested the Registrar General of the Court to remind the concerned judicial officer to abide by the guidelines of the High Court on Covid-19 pandemic in passing such orders in future.

Maratha quota: Centre moves Supreme Court for review of stripping states of power to declare SEBC

The Centre on Friday moved the Supreme Court seeking a review of the judgment of May 5 by the Constitution Bench which struck down Maratha reservation as envisaged by the Maharashtra Reservation for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Act.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.