Tuesday, June 22, 2021
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Vogue article was not just about MJ Akbar but about male bosses in general, Ramani tells court

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

New Delhi: The counsel of journalist Priya Ramani, who has been sued for defamation by former Union minister and editor MJ Akbar, today told the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Rouse Avenue Court that Ramani’s article in Vogue dealt not about Akbar alone, but was also about male bosses in general.

Senior Advocate Rebecca John, arguing for Ramani told the court that she agrees that she wrote the article and also owns up to the tweets, it is also true that the article was written in the context of the #MeToo movement and in the backdrop of the Harvey Weinstein revelations that happened in America.

Akbar has sued Ramani, accusing her of damaging his reputation by calling him a sexual predator in her articles. In the last hearing in February, Senior Advocate Geeta Luthra had argued on behalf of Akbar and had given her final arguments, alleging that she defamed him with full knowledge that her actions would harm his reputation.

journalist Priya Ramani
journalist Priya Ramani

John today began with a brief recap of the case, informing the court that a complaint was filed by Akbar against Ramani in October 2018. The allegations were based on Ramani’s Vogue article and her tweets.

John highlighted that point that the impugned article isn’t about Akbar alone and deals with both Akbar and other male bosses in general. Talking about the essentials of defamation, John argued that to make an imputation on the character of another when such imputation is made for the protection of a person or in the public good is not defamation. It is also not defamation to question the conduct of any person made in good faith and in reference to a public issue. Ramani, therefore, claims truth made in good faith and for public interest as defence, and if her claims are proven the defamation complaint won’t sustain.

Read Also: Vogue article was not just about MJ Akbar but about male bosses in general, Ramani tells court

John also brought to the court’s attention the contradictions in Akbar’s later statements as compared to his statements during his cross examination, where he has denied those facts that he said during his cross he didn’t remember.

The matter will be next heard on September 12.

– India Legal Bureau

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

News Update

Sedition: Abolish the colonial-era law

By Lokendra Malik Cri...

Supreme Court to take up plea challenging sacking of North MCD employee

The erstwhile Municipal Corporation of Delhi, prior to its trifurcation, hired the respondents on a contractual basis. The respondents raised an industrial dispute for their regularisation and of which reference was made.

Ambit of Section 50 NDPS Act– Critique whether there is a need to re-determine the ambit

It becomes imperative to analysis the ambit of section 50 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

Delhi High Court adjourns Virgin Atlantic Airways plea to July 13

The Delhi High Court on Monday adjourned a petition filed by Virgin Atlantic Airways against the Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation, for imposing TDS on the Airlines as the income of international airlines is exempted from taxation under the IT Act.

Madras HC grants six more weeks to CB-CID to probe sexual harassment of woman IPS officer

The Court is satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed by the Investigation Officer for not being able to complete the investigation within six weeks as expected by the Court in the previous order dated April 30, 2021.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.