Calcutta High Court

Calcutta High Court division bench held that no material has been placed before the Court by the petitioner to controvert the above report nor any prayer has been made to file exception to the report.

The Calcutta High Court ...

The Calcutta High Court ...

Calcutta High Court division bench disposed of the PIL permitting the petitioners to file an appropriate representation raising the grievance before respondent No.8.

Having heard counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record, Calcutta High Court division bench noted that  counsel for the petitioner could not point out that the candidates have fundamental right to demand the question papers in a particular language.

Having regard to the fact that it is a petition filed in the public interest and also considering the nature of controversy involved in the matter, the Calcutta High Court declined the prayer for withdrawal.

The Calcutta High Court ...

Calcutta High Court while disposing of a PIL filed by one Sandip Modak directed the Additional District Magistrate, Hooghly and District Land & Land Reforms Officer (DL&LRO), Hooghly to decide the representation of the petitioner on the issue of grant of patta in favour of the private respondent.

Calcutta High Court while hearing petition directed the State government to ensure disbursal of adequate funds within Six weeks and came down heavily on the SLSA for not having enough funds to provide compensation to victims as per the West Bengal Victim Compensation Scheme, 2017.

The Calcutta High Court ...