The Delhi High Court on Monday issued notice to the Delhi government while hearing a PIL seeking direction to the Delhi Government to cap the price of High-Resolution Computerized Tomography (HRCT) Test, which detects Covid-19 infection.

The division bench of Chief Justice D.N. Patel and Justice Jasmeet Singh passed this order while hearing a PIL filed by Shivleen Pasricha through Advocate Amresh Anand.

The petitioner advocate said currently, the price of HRCT test is unregulated in Delhi and it costs between Rs 5,000 to Rs 6,500 which maybe beyond the paying capacity of a common man. The price of HRCT/CT scan/ test has already been regulated by the governments of Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Punjab and Madhya Pradesh at a very low price as compared to what Delhi hospitals are charging.

The petition submitted that on several occasions, it has been seen that a suspected/probable Covid patient may have tested negative in RT-PCR test but the HRCT test catches it. It further submitted that the cost of the Test at present in Delhi is unregulated and very high, beyond the affordability of a common man.

The petition states,

“The need of the hour is to take immediate steps by the respondents to make HRCT, an essential test for Covid-19, available to the common man, at reasonable and affordable prices.”

“Hypothetically, if a nuclear family of 4 (four) is suspected to be infected by COVID-19, and they are to undergo HRCT for determining the specificity and/ or severity and/ or diagnosis of the infection, then they have to shell out a considerable amount of money which may be outside the scope of affordability of a common man,” the petition said.

Read Also: SC issues notice in Transport Ministry’s order of not allowing 10-yr-old diesel vehicles to ply in NCR

The PIL sought directions to the Respondents to take appropriate steps to regulate/ cap the rate of High-Resolution Computerised Tomography (‘HRCT’) test/ scan in the State of National Capital Territory of Delhi, specifically for patients having Covid-19 symptoms, in the interest of justice.

New Delhi (ILNS): The Bench of Chief Justice D. N. Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan, Delhi High Court today heard a PIL to hold institutions like the Reserve Bank of India and companies like Google Pay accountable for facilitating financial transactions without the requisite authorisation from RBI.

The petition was filed by a former IT consultant and self-proclaimed ‘financial economist’ Abhijit Mishra. Several PILs creating a stir have been filed in the recent times. PILs that question the intent of various institutions, from the Reserve Bank of India, and the National Housing Bank, to digital payments services such as Google Pay, PayPal, and payments banks like Paytm Payments Bank etc.

The Bench heard the petition after the rejoinder was filed by the petitioner.

Mishra filed a petition against RBI and Google questioning the illegality of the aforesaid in case of payments done through a third party app providers sharing information of customers outside India.

Mishra has contended that GPay was acting as a payments system provider in violation of the Payments and Settlements Act as it has no valid authorisation from the central bank of the country to carry out such functions.

He has also contended that except amazon pay all other 37 entities including GPay does not figure in NPCI’s list of authorised ‘payment systems operators’ released on March 20, 2019.

According to him, the third-party app provider (TPAP) can access to UPI systems and 4 banks have partnered with google pay i.e. Axis Bank, HDFC Bank, ICICI, and State Bank of India and there is no authorisation to google under Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 i.e NPCI has wrongly construed the PSS act, 2007. This act is ultra vires in nature and a criminal application is also filed under section 340 Crpc.

Mishra also contended that, the payment information shared with 3^rd party is in violation of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, Section 6, 35 A of Banking and Regulation act.

He also said that the data has been shared outside the country through these TPAPs while it should be kept in India. Upon which Hon’ble Justice Jalan said: “If RBI is okay and allowed the payment system, what is the Harm?”

The counsel for RBI has also told the court that since Google Pay does not operate any payment system, it does not find a place in the list of authorised payment system operators published by the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI).

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has told the Delhi High Court that Google Pay is a third party app provider (TPAP) and does not operate any payment systems.

Therefore, its operations are not in violation of the Payment and Settlement System Act of 2007.

Google Pay earlier contended that all transactions made through its platform are fully protected by redressal processes laid out in the guidelines issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the National Payments Corporation of India.

A spokesperson from google said that: “Google Pay operates completely within the law. Google Pay works as a technology service provider to partner banks, to allow payments via UPI (Unified Payments Interface). UPI apps in the country are categorised as ‘third party apps’, and are not required to be ‘payment systems operators.”

The matter is slated for next hearing on December 23.