Chief Justice Prakash Shrivastava

While considering the PIL, Calcutta High Court held that the same issue was in previous academic year 2021-22, wherein, WPA (P) 240 of 2021 was filed questioning the notification issued by the respondent University to grant admission on the basis of marks in qualifying examination instead of entrance.

Calcutta High Court division bench disposes of a PIL  filed by   practicing advocate of the High Court alleging improperinvestigation in respect of the incident of rape upon aminor girl by two drunken young men.

Calcutta High Court division bench held that no material has been placed before the Court by the petitioner to controvert the above report nor any prayer has been made to file exception to the report.

The Calcutta High Court ...

The Calcutta High Court ...

Calcutta High Court division bench disposed of the PIL permitting the petitioners to file an appropriate representation raising the grievance before respondent No.8.

Having regard to the fact that it is a petition filed in the public interest and also considering the nature of controversy involved in the matter, the Calcutta High Court declined the prayer for withdrawal.

Calcutta High Court while disposing of a PIL filed by one Sandip Modak directed the Additional District Magistrate, Hooghly and District Land & Land Reforms Officer (DL&LRO), Hooghly to decide the representation of the petitioner on the issue of grant of patta in favour of the private respondent.

The Calcutta High Court ...

The Calcutta High Court ...