Constitution of India

A petition has been filed in the Delhi High Court alleging that the new Privacy Policy introduced by WhatsApp is violative of the Right to Privacy provided under part III of the Constitution of India

The Delhi High Court on Saturday decided to hear the Delhi Nurses Union plea seeking release of salary since October 2020 for the protection of the legal rights

The bench of Chief Justice S.A. Bobde, Justices A.S. Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian said it would hear on Monday all the pleas challenging the new farm laws as also the ones raising issues related to the ongoing farmers protest.

The High Court had to determine if the Speaker can take suo motu cognizance under paragraph 6 of the Tenth Schedule and if the Court can exercise its power under Article 226 to grant interim relief in a matter connected with paragraph 6, Tenth Schedule.

New Delhi (ILNS): A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking direction to confiscate cent percent of Black Money, Benami properties and disproportionate assets of an accused person and stringent punishment should be awarded to them i.e. life imprisonment.

In a laudable move, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has said that producing suspects before the media is violative of Article 21 of the Constitution as unless he is convicted, his innocence has to be presumed.

Delhi HC said “to have a name and to express the same in the manner he wishes, is a part of the right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19 (1) (a) as well as right to liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The Constitution of India is tremendous and has numerous regions that each Indian resident ought to know about. In fact, it is of most extreme significance for each law aspirant to realize the Indian Constitution amazingly well as it shapes the premise of their schooling and profession.

A Public Interest Litigation has been filed in the Madhya Pradesh High Court seeking directions to bring in the use of A4 size paper, with printing on both sides of the paper.

A petition before the Jabalpur bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court has claimed that the appointment of 14 non-MLAs as ministers of the state, in the absence of any extraordinary or rare circumstances, is contrary to the Articles 163 and 164 of the Constitution of India.