Justice Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court has allowed an appeal against a judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court while observing that a document that is void need not be challenged by claiming a declaration as the said plea can be set up and proved even in collateral proceedings.

The Supreme Court has re...

The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed a plea filed by the doctors who had registered for the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (Postgraduate) exam, seeking direction to allow Centre Change Option to the aspirants and to postpone the exam of NEET-PG 2021.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued notice on a petition filed by candidates, who had registered for NEET-PG examination and were in advanced stages of pregnancy, seeking change in their centres.

The Supreme Court has dismissed a petition challenging the Full Court order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, recommending a retired Judge's compulsory retirement and order of Governor of Haryana, accepting the recommendation made by the full court of P&H High Court.

Supreme Court directed the Registry to list the plea before an appropriate bench against three persons accused of levelling serious allegations against Justice Rohinton Nariman and Justice Vineet Saran over their order sentencing Advocate Mathews Nedumpara guilty of Contempt of Court

The Supreme Court observed that the matter requiring interpretation of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act needs to be heard by a larger bench

The Top Court in May 2016, quashed the land released from acquisition and transferring developer Uddar Gagan Properties Limited company's licenses to Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA)

The Allahabad High Court Bench of Justice U U Lalit and Justice Ajay Rastogi after going through all the facts and hearing the petitioner in person has observed that the order passed by the Allahabad High Court is on merits and there is no reason to interfere with the impugned order.

On June 7, the state of Rajasthan had filed its reply against the plea of Asaram. The bench of Justice Navin Sinha and Justice Ajay Rastogi had on June 8 adjourned the matter, saying that the reply was filed yesterday evening and they didn’t get the time to read it.