Justice AS Bopanna

The Supreme Court on Thursday disposed of several connected appeals, while directing the Chandigarh Administration to decide the claim of conversion of allottees as on the date when consumer complaints were filed.

The Supreme Court on Thursday stayed the proceedings in the dispute between Amazon and Future Retail Limited (FRL) pending before the Delhi High Court for four weeks.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued notice on a petition filed by the Centre against the Calcutta High Court order, which had appointed Justice (Retd) Ranjit Kumar Beg of Calcutta High Court as sole arbitrator to settle the dispute between one Tarun Kanti Das, a contractor and Eastern Railways (Kolkata), arising out of a contract.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday adjourned to September 13 the hearing on a batch of petitions seeking probe into the alleged snooping carried out by the Central government on a number of politicians and journalists with the help of Israeli spyware Pegasus.

The Supreme Court on Monday directed the Chief Justice of Delhi High Court to expeditiously start hearing in the case related to the forced compulsory retirement of an IRS officer of the 1985 batch, who was compulsorily retired in 2019, in accordance with Fundamental Rule 56 (j).

Mukul Rohatgi, Senior Advocate for Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy started making submission that penalty proceedings were initiated, to which Solicitor General Tushar Mehta submitted that penalty proceedings are different.

The Supreme Court took suo motu cognisance of the delay being caused in the release of convicts after granting of bail on the ground that the jail authorities did not receive the authentic copy of the court order

A three-Judge Supreme Court bench directed the Union Public Service Commission and the Jharkhand Public Service Commission to file a reply in a plea alleging that they violated the apex court order on appointment of the Director General of Police

The Supreme Court today issued notice on a petition challenging the constitutional validity of Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, stating that such laws posed a serious threat to the functioning of administration, as well as individuals.

Supreme Court deferred hearing on Section 124A of IPC, saying it was ultra vires Article 19 (1) (a) of the Constitution, read with Articles 14 and 21