Justice P. Velmurugan

The Madras High Court ha...

The Madras High Court ha...

The Court noted that before the trial Court, the victim girl had deposed and further her statement was also recorded u/s.164 Cr.P.C. before the Magistrate, wherein she had clearly stated that the appellant had committed the offence.

An advocate P. Bagyalakshmi mislead the inspector of police via a letter stating that the order passed by the Hon’ble High Court on 3rd December has been revoked by the Court on 4th December and the order can’t be enforced by the Commissioner of Police, Chennai.