Madhya Pradesh HC

The Madhya Pradesh High ...

The outgoing year saw the working of the courts hit by the second wave of Covid-19. Despite that, the Apex Court continued with virtual hearings and then physical hearings as things began to get better until Omicron came calling.

The Division Bench of Justice Rohit Arya and Justice Deepak Kumar Agarwal appreciated the gesture of senior members of the Bar Association for their intervention to resolve the controversy

The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Tuesday observed that there cannot be any restriction on the movement of people from one state to another while disposing a petition.

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has recently observed it is best left to the Executive where a school should be located rather than Courts while dismissing a PIL.

The Tehsildar invoking his power under Section 32 of the M.P. Land Revenue Code, 159 restrained the Petitioners Rakesh Katare and Savita Katare from raising construction and further directed them to maintain status-quo on the nazul land, which was described as old Government Excise Warehouse Building.

Madhya Pradesh High Court on Wednesday directed Urban Local Bodies to decide the representation against the installation of mobile tower in the crowded locality within 15 days.

According to the petition, respondent No. 4 and 5 have applied for conversion of the land bearing Khasra No.107/11 ad-measuring 1.137 hectares out of which 1.00 acres of land was applied for conversion for commercial purposes on 21.12.2015.

Although the applications to demand anticipatory bail were dismissed in the month of December 2019 and September 2020 respectively, it appears that the applicant could be arrested only on February 4, 2021.

Vikas Mahawar, the Counsel appearing for District Bar Association, Sidhi stated that election of District Bar Association, Sidhi is scheduled to take place on April 7 2021.