In the Assistant Sub Inspector's petition challenging his transfer order, the Madhya Pradesh Court has observed that nothing has been pointed out to show that what was the ban period and why an employee who has still three years for retirement cannot be transferred.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court decision to find out if panel lawyers employed by central agencies and appearing before it had the requisite experience and vetted with courts is significant. The Court had frowned at appointing public prosecutors on contract basis earlier.
Reliance was made on the Judgement of the Apex Court in the case of Ram Naresh Rawat Vs. Ashwini Ray reported in 2017 (Vol 3) SCC 436, relevant extract of which reads-
Accused Bhagwan Singh moved to the apex court for grant of bail, challenging the order of Madhya Pradesh High Court, wherein the High Court dismissed the second bail application of Bhagwan Singh.
It was submitted by Counsel for the petitioner DP Singh that the father of the petitioner – Late Balram Singh Tomar was an employee of the School Education Department, posted as a Music teacher.
The Jabalpur Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court recently dismissed a number of petitions questioning the validity of the award passed by the Labour Court, Satna.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has directed the concerned authorities to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of three months seeking grant of benefit of the third-time pay scale to the petitioners on completion of 30 years of service.
The Calcutta High Court granted interim bail to all four TMC leaders in Narada scam case. The court said, the press will not give me a statement on pending litigation leaders and instructed to fill a private bond of two lakh rupees interim bail.