museum project company – India Legal https://www.indialegallive.com Your legal news destination! Mon, 12 Apr 2021 11:41:20 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.4 https://d2r2ijn7njrktv.cloudfront.net/IL/uploads/2020/12/16123527/cropped-IL_Logo-1-32x32.jpg museum project company – India Legal https://www.indialegallive.com 32 32 183211854 INS Viraat: Too late, Supreme Court tells museum project company https://www.indialegallive.com/top-news-of-the-day/news/ins-viraat-too-late-supreme-court-tells-museum-project-company/ Mon, 12 Apr 2021 11:12:17 +0000 https://www.indialegallive.com/?p=155599 Supreme CourtThe company Envitech Marine Consultants Pvt Ltd willing to convert the INR Viraat ship into a maritime museum and multi-functional adventure centre filed the petition seeking direction to the Union Ministry of Defence to allow to buy it.]]> Supreme Court

ILNS: The Supreme Court on Monday told the company which sought a direction to assess decommissioned aircraft carrier INS Viraat and turn it into a museum that it had come “too late”.

The bench of Chief Justice S.A. Bobde, Justice A.S. Bopanna and Justice V. Ramasubramanian said, “There is a legal open transaction between the Government and a private company, it has been dismantled till 40 percent, you are too late for this.”

The petition was filed by Envitech Marine Consultants Pvt Ltd seeking a direction to the Union Ministry of Defence to allow it to buy Viraat. The company wanted to convert it into a maritime museum and multi-functional adventure centre.

Previously, the Bombay High Court had asked the Centre to decide on the petitioner’s request that the Viraat be handed over to it, so that it could be converted into a museum. The High Court had then disposed of the matter. The warship is awaiting dismantling at a scrapping yard in Alang, Gujarat.

Read Also: Tehseen Poonawalla moves Supreme Court against age bars to Covid-19 vaccination

Earlier, the Supreme Court had stayed the dismantling of the warship. However today, it dismissed the petition challenging the Bombay High Court order.

]]>
155599