The Madras High Court dismisses a PIL seeking direction to provide preference to inter-caste marriage candidates in employment being made through all channels, including the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission.
The present PIL in Gauhati High Court has been filed Education Act (for short RTE Act) read with Rules 7 & 8 of the Assam Right to education Rules and Notifications issued to that effect.
Bombay High Court division bench observed that even in their Judgment since the NGT is seized with the main issue about the identification of properties as forest lands, it's only appropriate that the petitioners if they choose, should approach the NGT with the grievance now raised in this petition.
A single-judge bench of Allahabad High Court while hearing a petition filed by Ashish Pandey and 16 Ors observed that fresh facts and new grounds of attack can be taken on the record only upon an amendment application and not through supplementary affidavits.
The Chhattisgarh High Court disposes of a PIL alleging that from the year 2007 to 2011 though various roads were constructed by the respondents authorities under the Scheme commonly known as ADB projects, the quality of the construction was abysmally poor and was much below the minimum specification.
Allahabad High Court while hearing the PIL directed the State Government to file counter affidavit/affidavit to be sworn in by none other than the Principal Secretary, Law/ Legal Remembrancer himself stating therein as to what steps are being taken/proposed to be taken for ensuring.