State of Uttar Pradesh

The Supreme Court on Fri...

The Supreme Court has asked a couple against whom multiple FIRs get registered in the State of Uttar Pradesh, to file additional an affidavit on record with regard to their plea seeking transfer of all cases outside the State.

The Allahabad High Court has refused to interfere with the decision of a Single-Judge bench in the case of MRC candidates in the Assistant Teacher recruitment case, paving way for recruitment of 68,500 assistant teachers in the state.

A single bench of Allahabad High Court said that due to non-presentation of correct facts in the Court, on the basis of parity of bail granted to co-accused, the accused does not get the right of bail.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of Uttar Pradesh as the Allahabad High Court had held that an appointment lettear of Junior civil engineers of the irrigation department was already issued to them a day before the cut-off date, therefore the joining date is immaterial.

A Supreme Court bench has directed the Senior AAG to file a counter-affidavit, with regard to her submission when the court was hearing a plea that has sought to quash notices sent to alleged protestors causing damage to the public properties during anti-CAA agitations in the state.

The petitioners moved to the Supreme court by instant writ petitions seek to highlight unchallenged rulings from the Juvenile Justice Board where they have been declared Juveniles with a clear age limit of 18 years, yet no steps have been taken to release them forthwith.

The petitioners moved Supreme Court by virtue of the instant writ petitions seeks to highlight unchallenged rulings from Juvenile Justice Board wherein the petitioners have been declared Juveniles with clear findings that they were all below the age limit of 18 years.

The Allahabad High Court on Friday refused to entertain a PIL seeking directions to the State of Uttar Pradesh to perform the last rites and dispose of the dead bodies buried along the Ganga at different ghats in Prayagraj as early as possible.

The petitioner says that the said writ was last listed before the court in March 2019 and since then it has not been listed, despite many applications for listing. Moreover, the matter is for final hearing as a counter and rejoinders have already been placed.