Vikas Path – India Legal https://www.indialegallive.com Your legal news destination! Sat, 28 May 2022 20:36:11 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.4 https://d2r2ijn7njrktv.cloudfront.net/IL/uploads/2020/12/16123527/cropped-IL_Logo-1-32x32.jpg Vikas Path – India Legal https://www.indialegallive.com 32 32 183211854 Rajasthan High Court disposes PIL assailing the construction of Vikas Path through the agriculture land https://www.indialegallive.com/top-news-of-the-day/news/rajasthan-high-court-disposes-pil-vikas-path/ Sat, 28 May 2022 20:29:24 +0000 https://www.indialegallive.com/?p=272195 Rajasthan High CourtThe Rajasthan High Court on Thursday, disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed assailing the action of the respondents in constructing the Vikas Path (Road) through the agriculture land of the village Tinwari. The PIL has been filed by one Vijay Kumar Goyal. Kuldeep Mathur, the senior Counsel submitted  that as per the proposal dated […]]]> Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court on Thursday, disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed assailing the action of the respondents in constructing the Vikas Path (Road) through the agriculture land of the village Tinwari.

The PIL has been filed by one Vijay Kumar Goyal.

Kuldeep Mathur, the senior Counsel submitted  that as per the proposal dated 3.10.2019, the Vikas Path (Road) was required to be constructed on land entered as ‘Abadi’ in the revenue record and thus, the respondents have flouted the said order by constructing the road on agricultural khasras.

To this submission, the Additional Advocate General  K.S.Rajpurohit, submitted  that it was consciously decided on 3.10.2019, that the road shall be constructed in the area which has been inhabited by population and not on land which has been designated to be Abadi land in the revenue record.

This fact is affirmed from the perusal of Clause No.9 (III) of the order dated 3.10.2019. The road in question has already been constructed.

In this view of the matter, the Division Bench of Justice Sandeep Mehta and Justice Vinod Kumar Bharwani opined that there is no merit in the PIL, so disposed it.

]]>
272195