{"id":123549,"date":"2020-11-05T17:46:10","date_gmt":"2020-11-05T12:16:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/?p=123549"},"modified":"2020-12-09T15:21:13","modified_gmt":"2020-12-09T09:51:13","slug":"bombay-high-court-to-resume-hearing-of-habeas-corpus-petition-of-arnab-goswami-tomorrow","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/constitutional-law-news\/courts-news\/bombay-high-court-to-resume-hearing-of-habeas-corpus-petition-of-arnab-goswami-tomorrow\/","title":{"rendered":"Bombay High Court to resume hearing of Habeas Corpus petition of Arnab Goswami tomorrow"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

New Delhi (ILNS):<\/strong> Subsequent to the arrest of the Republic TV Editor-in-Chief Arnab Goswami by the Mumbai Police yesterday, a two-judge bench of Bombay High Court comprising Justices S S Shinde and M S Karnik issued notice in the habeas petition filed by Goswami in an abetment to suicide case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senior Advocate Aabad Ponda (generally argues on the criminal side) represented Arnab Goswami in the court. He said: \u201cThe investigation which began from October 15 is illegal. The manner in which the arrest was done to the \u2018bad-boy\u2019 of TV journalism \u2013 he was arrested by 40 people with stun-guns.\u201d Ponda further stated that without a judicial order, the police suo motu began this illegal investigation and argued that his client is behind in an illegal manner. He further submitted before the court that he wants to press only for interim reliefs, that is, the stay of investigation in the FIR of 2018.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"journalist<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Senior advocate Harish Salve, arguing over video conference from London, said:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThere are several cases filed against Goswami as he is a journalist and he should be released\u2026 Will the heavens fall on Maharashtra if he is released on interim?\u201d<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Ponda informed the court that there was only an intimation to the judicial magistrate on October 15 that they are re-opening the investigation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The bench allowed the amendment of the petition to implead the informant in the petition of Arnab Goswami.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Justice Shinde asked if the informant (Akshata Naik) is a necessary party to the petition of Arnab Goswami and said, \u201cInformant is not made a party in your petition.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Also Read: <\/strong>Future Group files caveat petition in Delhi High Court, apprehending Amazon move<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

To this Salve said: \u201cPlease give us leave to amend the petition and add the informant here itself.\u201d Advocate Vaibhav Karnik appeared for Akshata Naik.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The matter will be heard tomorrow at 3 pm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

-India Legal Bureau<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Subsequent to the arrest of the Republic TV Editor-in-Chief Arnab Goswami by the Mumbai Police yesterday, a two-judge bench of Bombay High Court comprising Justices S S Shinde and M S Karnik issued notice in the habeas petition filed by Goswami in an abetment to suicide case.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":123558,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[246],"tags":[80878,4022,1166,1252,96632,23952,96633,96634,6643,96640,65814],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/d2r2ijn7njrktv.cloudfront.net\/IL\/uploads\/2020\/11\/05174533\/Arnab-Goswami.png","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123549"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=123549"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123549\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/123558"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=123549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=123549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=123549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}