{"id":208491,"date":"2021-09-10T19:24:32","date_gmt":"2021-09-10T13:54:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/?p=208491"},"modified":"2021-09-11T15:42:55","modified_gmt":"2021-09-11T10:12:55","slug":"delhi-high-court-tells-google-youtube-delhi-police-centre-to-remove-objectionable-photos-videos-of-woman","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/constitutional-law-news\/courts-news\/delhi-high-court-tells-google-youtube-delhi-police-centre-to-remove-objectionable-photos-videos-of-woman\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court tells Google, YouTube, Delhi Police, Centre to remove objectionable photos, videos of woman"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
The Delhi High Court <\/a>has directed Google,\u00a0YouTube, Cyber Cell of Delhi Police and the Central Government\u00a0to take necessary steps to remove the sites and links, carrying objectionable photos and videos of\u00a0a woman.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A Single-Judge Bench of Justice Subramonium Prasad passed the order on September 7, while hearing the plea of an aggrieved woman seeking:<\/p>\n\n\n\n i. Direction to block the sites, which under pseudo names are operating as pornographic sites.<\/p>\n\n\n\n ii. Direction to delink\/de-tag\/de-reference\/deindex the name of petitioner from respective search engines, providing access to adult or pornographic sites.<\/p>\n\n\n\n iii. Direction to block any nude or sexually explicit or morphed photos of petitioner appearing on their sites respectively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n iv. Direction to register an FIR on the complaint of the petitioner made to Lajpat Nagar Police Station, New Delhi and to conduct an expeditious investigation in the matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n v. Direction to YouTube, to block channels in the name of the petitioner.<\/p>\n\n\n\n vi. Direction to seize CCTV footage of Union bank of India, Lajpat Nagar Brach, New Delhi as the same would corroborate the extortion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Bench directed\u00a0Advocate\u00a0Sanjeev Mahajan, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, to implead the accused, further directing the\u00a0concerned SHO to assist\u00a0Advocate Mahajan in serving the accused. Justice\u00a0Prasad said, “It is made clear that this is not an adversarial litigation.” The bench fixed the next date of hearing on September 16.<\/p>\n\n\n\nNot an adversarial litigation: Delhi High Court<\/a> <\/h2>\n\n\n\n