Delhi High Court grants time to petitioner saying Delhi govt formed Delhi Healthcare Corp without LG approval<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\nHe added that it was not a \u201cmere administrative inquiry,\u201d but also dealt with the criminal aspect of the case and the same was arbitrary and against the law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Senior Counsel Darius Khambata, representing Maharashtra government, said the petition pertained to \u201cservice matters\u201d and should be raised before CAT. Opposing Singh\u2019s contention that the government action was a form of vendetta, Khambata said the complaint was lodged by Dange in February, long before Singh\u2019s letter on March 20 accusing Deshmukh of corruption.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Jethmalani said the government, with the help of DGP Sanjay Pandey, was trying to convince Singh to withdraw the lette.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Khambata had told the court that as the DGP has recused himself from the probes and other officers would conduct the investigations now, Singh\u2019s plea should be rendered infructuous and non-maintainable. The state had submitted the progress report of the two inquiries in a sealed cover to the High Court.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The Bombay High Court on Thursday termed as non-maintainable, the petition filed by former Mumbai Police Commissioner Param Bir Singh, seeking quashing of two preliminary enquiries (PEs) initiated against him by the Maharashtra government.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":161239,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[60003,246],"tags":[98068,1252,3046,4490,109337],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/d2r2ijn7njrktv.cloudfront.net\/IL\/uploads\/2021\/04\/30142413\/images-2021-04-30T142348.182.jpeg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210876"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=210876"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210876\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/161239"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=210876"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=210876"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=210876"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}