{"id":249395,"date":"2022-01-24T19:05:12","date_gmt":"2022-01-24T13:35:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/?p=249395"},"modified":"2022-01-24T19:50:32","modified_gmt":"2022-01-24T14:20:32","slug":"video-supreme-courts-big-decision-on-rights-of-daughters-tarun-tejpal-sexual-harassment-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/videos\/video-supreme-courts-big-decision-on-rights-of-daughters-tarun-tejpal-sexual-harassment-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Video: Supreme Court on actor Dileep sexual harassment case, Karkardooma Court frames sedition charges against Sharjeel Imam in anti-CAA speeches"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The Supreme Court rejected the clarification application on the Shaheen Bagh verdict \u2026 said, the verdict speaks for itself \u2026 the verdict said that public places cannot be occupied indefinitely<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Karkardooma Court frames sedition charges against Sharjeel Imam in the case of anti-CAA speeches\u2026.. Action on anti-CAA speeches given in AMU, Jamia<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The bail petition of Bhadohi MLA Vijay Mishra was also rejected by the Supreme Court \u2026 Allahabad High Court also dismissed the petition \u2026 Vijay Mishra, including his son-daughter and nephews, are facing cases against 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Supreme Court refuses to give direction on state’s plea for extension of the time limit in actor Dileep sexual harassment case\u2026.the decision is left to the discretion of the trial court<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Supreme Court rejected the clarification application on the Shaheen Bagh verdict \u2026 said, the verdict speaks for itself \u2026 the verdict said that public places cannot be occupied indefinitely Karkardooma Court frames sedition charges against Sharjeel Imam in the case of anti-CAA speeches\u2026.. Action on anti-CAA speeches given in AMU, Jamia The bail petition […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":183705,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"video","meta":{"footnotes":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[95887],"tags":[79275,1377,269,83352,20232,457],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/d2r2ijn7njrktv.cloudfront.net\/IL\/uploads\/2021\/07\/09151534\/courtsss.png","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/249395"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=249395"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/249395\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/183705"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=249395"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=249395"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=249395"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}