{"id":267794,"date":"2022-04-25T11:56:06","date_gmt":"2022-04-25T06:26:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/?p=267794"},"modified":"2022-10-12T16:15:11","modified_gmt":"2022-10-12T10:45:11","slug":"supreme-court-collegium-additional-judges-calcutta-high-court-permanent-judges","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/top-news-of-the-day\/news\/supreme-court-collegium-additional-judges-calcutta-high-court-permanent-judges\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Collegium recommends elevation of five additional judges of Calcutta High Court as permanent judges"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/constitutional-law-news\/supreme-court-news\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Supreme Court<\/a> Collegium has recommended names of five additional judges of the Calcutta High Court, who should be made permanent judges of that court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The decision to this effect was taken in a meeting of the Collegium held on April 19.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The five judges who have been approved for the appointment as permanent judges are:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol><li>Justice Kesang Doma Bhutia;<\/li><li>Justice Rabindranath Samanta;<\/li><li>Justice Sugato Majumdar;<\/li><li>Justice Bivas Pattanayak; and<\/li><li>Justice Ananda Kumar Mukherjee.<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Also Read: <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/constitutional-law-news\/supreme-court-news\/supreme-court-adjourns-appeal-high-court-vadodara-palace\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Supreme Court adjourns appeal against Gujarat High Court order on Vadodara palace<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As on April 1, 2022, the sanctioned strength of the Calcutta High Court is 72 judges, whereas they are functioning with 39 judges, a vacancy position of 33.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court Collegium has recommended names of five additional judges of the Calcutta High Court, who should be made permanent judges of that court.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":200863,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[3],"tags":[1368,116860,116981,116980,110683,116979,38629,2982],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/d2r2ijn7njrktv.cloudfront.net\/IL\/uploads\/2021\/08\/25143213\/calcutta-high-court.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267794"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=267794"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267794\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/200863"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=267794"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=267794"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=267794"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}