{"id":272538,"date":"2022-06-01T15:14:14","date_gmt":"2022-06-01T09:44:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/?p=272538"},"modified":"2022-10-12T16:24:25","modified_gmt":"2022-10-12T10:54:25","slug":"delhi-high-court-amanatullah-khan-aap","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/constitutional-law-news\/courts-news\/delhi-high-court-amanatullah-khan-aap\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court seeks response from Delhi Police on calling AAP leader Amanatullah Khan bad character"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The Delhi Police on Wednesday received a notice from Delhi High Court, asking them to file a status report\u00a0on Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Amanatullah Khan, for listing him as ‘bad character,’ after opening the ‘history sheet’ against him.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A Single-Judge Bench of Justice\u00a0Dinesh Kumar Sharma\u00a0refused to pass orders to Delhi Police for taking action against Khan.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Bench told the Counsel that it was likely to curtail his personal liberty, but the matter required serious consideration. The Court also assured to give a date for hearing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Justice Sharma further refused to issue any order to police for bringing this matter before the media and the people. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Khan had also moved the High Court, seeking quashing of the history sheet on the grounds that it was issued in violation of the Punjab Police Rules. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

These rules were applicable to Delhi Police as well, the petitioner had contended.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Khan’s Counsel, Advocate M. Sufian Siddiqui, said before the Court that whether a person was accused or not, was also decided by court, even though the concerned police officer had to accord reasons, whenever a history sheet was opened and a person was listed as ‘bad character’, but the procedure for the same as provided under the Rules was followed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The details of the development have to be kept secret, but it was leaked to the media, he alleged.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The petitioner argued that police leaked the matter to newspapers, which published it. He contended that this was in complete violation of his rights under Article 21.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, Delhi Police Counsel stated that the details were not leaked by the Police.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Counsel for Delhi Police said since Khan was a political person and he may have leaked the details himself. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Delhi Police Counsel asserted that police did not leak anything, adding that 16 FIRs were registered against Khan.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Khan’s Counsel replied that Khan has either been discharged, or was on bail in 14 of these FIRs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The High Court fixed July 28 as the next date of hearing.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Delhi Police on Wednesday received a notice from Delhi High Court, asking them to file a status report\u00a0on Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Amanatullah Khan, for listing him as ‘bad character,’ after opening the ‘history sheet’ against him. A Single-Judge Bench of Justice\u00a0Dinesh Kumar Sharma\u00a0refused to pass orders to Delhi Police for taking action […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":155818,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[246,58578],"tags":[3891,38130,1377,39,114655],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/d2r2ijn7njrktv.cloudfront.net\/IL\/uploads\/2021\/04\/13131335\/Delhi-HC.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/272538"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=272538"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/272538\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/155818"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=272538"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=272538"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=272538"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}