{"id":315630,"date":"2023-07-19T18:29:00","date_gmt":"2023-07-19T12:59:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/?p=315630"},"modified":"2023-07-19T18:29:02","modified_gmt":"2023-07-19T12:59:02","slug":"journalist-supreme-court-licence-law-in-own-hands","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/constitutional-law-news\/supreme-court-news\/journalist-supreme-court-licence-law-in-own-hands\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court refuses to extend interim protection from arrest to scribe, says being a journalist doesn’t give licence to take law in own hands"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to extend the interim protection from arrest granted to a journalist in a bribery case, noting that being a journalist or a reporter did not give a person the licence to take the law into his own hands.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Division Bench of Justice A.S. Bopanna and Justice M.M. Sundresh observed that the petitioner was no longer entitled to the interim protection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While hearing a petition filed by a journalist who was denied anticipatory bail by the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the Apex Court noted that the petitioner was involved in other cases as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The petitioner had claimed that he was trying to expose a racket involving the illegal sale and purchase of a newborn child.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Claiming to be an accredited correspondent, the petitioner said he had published a news item in Dainik Bhaskar newspaper on July 26, 2021, exposing a racket involving illegal sale of a newborn child.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, an FIR registered against him alleged that he sought illegal gratification to suppress the news.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He contended that as a counter blast, one of the accused in the case had registered a case against him and others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On November 28, 2022, the Apex Court had granted interim protection against arrest to the petitioner and other journalists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Division Bench today noted that the petitioner, along with other journalists, were no longer entitled to the interim protection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It said at this stage, the Court had the benefit of the counter statement filed on behalf of the state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Refusing to go into the nature of the allegations at the current stage, the top court of the country noted that the petitioners were also involved in other cases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It also took note of the fact submitted by the counsel representing the State of Madhya Pradesh that the investigation against the petitioners had been completed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It granted liberty to the investigating officer to decide whether there was a need for the petitioners to be taken into custody.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to extend the interim protection from arrest granted to a journalist in a bribery case, noting that being a journalist or a reporter did not give a person the licence to take the law into his own hands. The Division Bench of Justice A.S. Bopanna and Justice M.M. Sundresh […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":288745,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[246,64,2176],"tags":[54910,6516,3105,20232],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/d2r2ijn7njrktv.cloudfront.net\/IL\/uploads\/2022\/10\/21191319\/Supreme-Court-Nedumpara.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315630"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=315630"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315630\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/288745"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=315630"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=315630"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=315630"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}