{"id":315857,"date":"2023-07-22T14:44:45","date_gmt":"2023-07-22T09:14:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/?p=315857"},"modified":"2023-07-22T14:44:46","modified_gmt":"2023-07-22T09:14:46","slug":"supreme-court-bihar-government-stay-on-caste-census","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/constitutional-law-news\/supreme-court-news\/supreme-court-bihar-government-stay-on-caste-census\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court dismisses Bihar government plea challenging stay on caste census"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The Supreme Court has disposed of a petition filed by the government of Bihar, which challenged the stay on Caste-based Census in view of the May 4 Patna High Court order that reserved its verdict on the same.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Bench of Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra passed the orders on a petition filed by the government of Bihar against the High Court\u2019s interim order.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A Division Bench of the Patna High Court had passed the interim orders, while determining whether the state government was competent to conduct the survey.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Apex Court disposed of the petition after the counsel appearing for both sides agreed that the matter had become infructuous since the High Court had already reserved its verdict.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court has disposed of a petition filed by the government of Bihar, which challenged the stay on Caste-based Census in view of the May 4 Patna High Court order that reserved its verdict on the same. The Bench of Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra passed the orders on a petition [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":287749,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[246,64],"tags":[59556,116571,2143,20232],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/d2r2ijn7njrktv.cloudfront.net\/IL\/uploads\/2022\/10\/13121603\/Supreme-Court-jpg-Banshika-min.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315857"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=315857"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315857\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/287749"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=315857"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=315857"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=315857"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}