{"id":316212,"date":"2023-07-28T23:27:51","date_gmt":"2023-07-28T17:57:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/?p=316212"},"modified":"2023-07-28T23:27:53","modified_gmt":"2023-07-28T17:57:53","slug":"supreme-court-cpi-recount-madurai-council-votes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/constitutional-law-news\/supreme-court-news\/supreme-court-cpi-recount-madurai-council-votes\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court issues notice on CPI plea seeking recount of Madurai Council votes"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice on a petition filed by a Communist Party of India candidate, seeking recounting of elections to the Madurai Corporation in 2022.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Bench of Justice Aniruddh Bose and Justice Bela M. Trivedi passed the order on a petition filed by CPI candidate K. Muthu Sumathi, a candidate of Communist Party of India against the victory of AIADMK candidate K. Chokkayee by four votes as a Councillor in Madurai Corporation in 2022.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The petitioner alleged irregularities by erring officials, pointing out that the officials had declared AIADMK candidate as winner by four votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As per the petitioner, the Election Rules mandated two key obligations- handing over data which contained vote details to the candidate and providing a reasonable opportunity for raising grievances and requesting a recount of votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The petitioner contended that these obligations were not fulfilled.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice on a petition filed by a Communist Party of India candidate, seeking recounting of elections to the Madurai Corporation in 2022. The Bench of Justice Aniruddh Bose and Justice Bela M. Trivedi passed the order on a petition filed by CPI candidate K. Muthu Sumathi, a candidate of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":304433,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[246,64],"tags":[82373,127239,127237,127238,20232],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/d2r2ijn7njrktv.cloudfront.net\/IL\/uploads\/2023\/03\/09142253\/Supreme-Court-Vivek-Agnihotri-Compressed-scaled.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/316212"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=316212"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/316212\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/304433"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=316212"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=316212"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=316212"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}