{"id":331699,"date":"2024-02-17T13:41:28","date_gmt":"2024-02-17T08:11:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/?p=331699"},"modified":"2024-02-17T13:41:40","modified_gmt":"2024-02-17T08:11:40","slug":"supreme-court-housewife-compensation-motor-accident-claim-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/constitutional-law-news\/supreme-court-news\/supreme-court-housewife-compensation-motor-accident-claim-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court enhances compensation in motor accident claim case, says contributions of homemaker cannot be quantified in monetary terms"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The Supreme Court, while setting aside an order of the Uttarakhand High Court in a motor accident claim case, observed that the value of a woman\u2019s work at home was no less than that of someone who brought a salary from office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Bench of Justice Suryan Kant and Justice KV Viswanathan noted on Friday that the worth of a woman looking after the household was of a \u201chigh order\u201d and her contributions were hard to quantify in monetary terms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Apex Court made the observations while hearing a motor accident case arising out of the unfortunate death of a woman from Uttarakhand in a road accident in 2006. As the vehicle in which she was travelling was not insured, the liability fell on the owner of the vehicle to pay her family the compensation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A motor accident claims tribunal awarded her family\u2014 her husband and minor son \u2014 damages of Rs 2.5 lakh. The family appealed in the Uttarakhand high court for higher compensation, but their plea was dismissed in 2017.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Supreme Court, while setting aside an order of the Uttarakhand High Court in a motor accident claim case, observed that the value of a woman\u2019s work at home was no less than that of someone who brought a salary from office. The Bench of Justice Suryan Kant and Justice KV Viswanathan noted on Friday […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":50,"featured_media":331701,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[246,64],"tags":[123130,99554,130653,130652,20232],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/d2r2ijn7njrktv.cloudfront.net\/IL\/uploads\/2024\/02\/17134113\/SC-2-1068x601-1-7-4.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/331699"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/50"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=331699"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/331699\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/331701"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=331699"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=331699"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=331699"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}