{"id":332796,"date":"2024-02-29T23:23:24","date_gmt":"2024-02-29T17:53:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/?p=332796"},"modified":"2024-02-29T23:23:24","modified_gmt":"2024-02-29T17:53:24","slug":"rajasthan-high-court-dismisses-pil-filed-constitution-to-remove-certain-words","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/constitutional-law-news\/courts-news\/rajasthan-high-court-dismisses-pil-filed-constitution-to-remove-certain-words\/","title":{"rendered":"Rajasthan High Court dismisses PIL filed with a prayer for amendment in the constitution to remove certain words"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The Rajasthan High Court imposed a Cost of Rs. Rs.10,000\/- on the Petitioner and dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed with a prayer for amendment in the Constitution to remove certain words by substituting appropriate words.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The PIL has been filed by Girdhar Lal Acharya  (Aged About 90 Years) with one other.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The petitioner has come out with a prayer for amendment in the Constitution to remove certain words by substituting appropriate words as, according to the understanding of the petitioners, those words are not appropriate with reference to the high constitutional functionaries.   <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Division Bench of Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice Munnuri Laxman observed, “This petition is frivolous as it could be”. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Court finds that no case is made out for entertaining this petition. “The petition is dismissed with cost of Rs.10,000\/-.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Rajasthan High Court imposed a Cost of Rs. Rs.10,000\/- on the Petitioner and dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed with a prayer for amendment in the Constitution to remove certain words by substituting appropriate words. The PIL has been filed by Girdhar Lal Acharya  (Aged About 90 Years) with one other. The petitioner […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":332799,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[246,58815],"tags":[117636,130828,130827,2718],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/d2r2ijn7njrktv.cloudfront.net\/IL\/uploads\/2024\/02\/29171309\/Rajasthan-High-Court-1.webp","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332796"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=332796"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332796\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/332799"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=332796"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=332796"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=332796"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}