{"id":4977,"date":"2014-12-16T10:27:23","date_gmt":"2014-12-16T10:27:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/indialegalonline.com\/?p=4977"},"modified":"2017-10-16T12:21:25","modified_gmt":"2017-10-16T06:51:25","slug":"modi-weakening","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/people\/inderjit-badhwar\/modi-weakening\/","title":{"rendered":"Is Modi weakening?"},"content":{"rendered":"
Editorial by Inderjit Badhwar<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n That exactly is Modi\u2019s idea of India and how, exactly, has post-electoral Modi-ism been shaping India\u2019s political scenario? The fashionable criticism of the new prime minister is that he is an addicted foreign junketeer traipsing from capital to capital and from one NRI audience to another in search of foreign approbation, while domestically he has laid nothing more than one big, fat egg. They ask: What\u2019s he done?<\/span><\/p>\n This column is by no means a year-after report card on Modi but an attempt to understand, through my own evaluation of the man, where he seems to be headed in the context of the mood of the nation. That the country is on a tight leash and short fuse, given the Congress catastrophe, the regional parties\u2019 flop, and the Aam Aadmi roller-coaster, is a given. That its people will no longer suffer fools gladly or, like lemmings, join a religious or ideological mass movement in a headlong rush to destruction, is also scripted quite clearly.<\/span><\/p>\n And herein lies a lesson for Modi\u2019s opponents on the Right as well as the Left\u2014not to exult in haste in the celebration of the end of the Modi honeymoon. It is far from over. Before answering what he\u2019s done, let me tell you what he\u2019s not done. He has NOT: Cleaned up the Ganga; restored 8 percent GDP growth; introduced judicial reform; ended the rape and subjugation of women; rebuilt our cities or renewed urban India; accelerated farm production; introduced meaningful tax reform; introduced disinvestment plans; revamped Air India; cut down the bureaucracy; shut down terrorist camps in Pakistan.<\/span><\/p>\n On the DONE side: He has delivered on a platter to his party the most handsome victory it has ever enjoyed; shattered the Gandhi dynasty; replaced the creaky old guard with new faces; defied the RSS strongmen in Gujarat as well as nationally; trounced the Shiv Sena (which was secretly backed by the RSS) in Maharashtra, and the traditional alliances in Har-yana; consolidated his administrative hold on more parts of India than ever before; anointed himself Maximum Leader of SAARC without alienating Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka; made the Chinese leadership sit up and pay attention to a new India; sent out a message of modernity at BRICS; encouraged a beefing up of business confidence by attracting $50 billion in less than three months from Japan, China, and the US; tightened the screws on the bureaucracy; and focused world attention as never before on India by getting Obama, the president of the most powerful country in the world, to agree to come as chief guest on Republic Day.<\/span><\/p>\n For the first time since independence, the world press will flock to India to cover Bharat\u2019s Republic Day parade. No mean achievement. But in my mind, Modi\u2019s greatest achievement so far, has been in picking up the broom and beginning to sweep India. Sure, it was a symbolic gesture and one Modi broom does not a clean India make. But you\u2019ve got to start somewhere. You\u2019ve got to send a message\u2014something that Nehru should have treated on par with inaugurating the Bhakra Dam.<\/span><\/p>\n The important thing here is that Prime Minister Modi, in his first year, practicing the art of the possible, has given a direction. His message has been one of hope rather than blame letting or ideology. There is nothing unclear or opaque in whatever he has done.<\/span> Both these groups want Modi to fail in order to make a place for themselves: The Congress and various samajwadi groups because they have been wiped out by a Modi-created wave that ushered in a strong central government at the expense of family-led reg-ional, castetist parties; and the hard Right, whose slogans and ideological lines Modi (once their pet child) refused to espouse throughout his election campaign.<\/span><\/p>\n The test of Modi\u2019s leadership will lie in his dexterity in sidelining the forces, including the Hindutva hardliners, which interfere with his larger vision.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n <\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n (Above) Prime Minister Modi addressing a gathering in Brisbane, Australia, in November<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n This common agenda will succeed only to the extent that Modi will be deflected from his administrative and political goals of modernizing the economy and creating jobs and loosening the nationally enervating ministerial and bureaucratic stranglehold over entrepreneurial energy and human rights. Modi\u2019s political acumen will be tested by whether he wastes his energy in firefighting these elements or preserves it to pursue the larger vision for which he was elected and whose implementation will be his ultimate vindication as a Gen Next Leader.<\/span><\/p>\n Is he weakening? Some of his intellectual supporters think so. The inimitable sociologist-economist Surjit Bhalla says: \u201cAre (HRD Minis-ter) Smriti Irani\u2019s (decreeing compul-sory Sanskrit in schools) and Swaraj\u2019s national book interrelated with the Hindutva elements? If so, wasn\u2019t Modi\u2019s appeal meant to transcend such narrow, non-national fundamentalist agendas? How will Sanskrit and the national book help provide education and\/or create jobs for the poor?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Bhalla adds that while the PM seems to grasp what is required, the same cannot be said for the members of his party, or the bureaucracy. Modi seems to have been captured by the bureaucracy, which is unfortunate and entirely unnecessary. Nor should he be beholden to the narrow agendas of Hindutva or the RSS, says Bhalla.<\/span><\/p>\n Our own writers elsewhere in this magazine, in a section sub-headed \u201cnew-saffronism\u201d, also dwell at length on this issue. But there is a silver lining. Veteran journalist Farzand Ahmed, who spent the last fortnight in Ayodhya, writes that the majoritarian<\/span> Herein lies a lesson for Modi. No matter what the ground level noise, no matter how much the media and political provocation for him to get involved in the petty ground level noises from the Left and Right, he must, as the nation\u2019s Prime Minister, rise above them, stick solidly to the Rule of Law, and keep marching ahead with his agenda of eliminating corruption, crony capitalism, joblessness. His pursuit of his dream of a fast-modernizing India, upward mobility, speedy delivery of justice, the pursuit of world excellence in technology was what made him stand apart from the crowd\u2014including his own party\u2014and helped put 2002 behind him during the last election. He can never afford to forget that.<\/span><\/p>\n Nonetheless, writers like Pankaj Mishra still believe that Modi represents Hindu revanchist and supremacist ideas which are quintessentially anti-West: He wrote recently in The New York Times:<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cNarendra Modi, India\u2019s new prime minister and main ideologue of the Hindu-nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party, is stoking old Hindu rage-and-shame over what he calls more than a thousand years of slavery under Muslim and British rule. Earlier this mon-th, while India and Pakistan were engaging in their heaviest fighting in over a decade, Mr Modi claimed that the \u2018enemy\u2019 was now \u2018screaming.\u2019<\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n Modi with US President Barack Obama in\u2008Washington<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n \u201cSince Mr Naipaul defined it, the apocalyptic Ind-ian imagination has been enriched by the exploits of Hindu nationalists, such as the destruction in 1992 of the 16th-century Babri Masjid mosque, and the nuclear tests of 1998. Celebrating the tests in speeches in the late 1990s, including one entitled \u2018Ek Aur Mahabharata\u2019 (One More Mahabharata), the then head of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (the Nat-ional Volunteers Association, or RSS), the parent outfit of Hindu nationalists, claimed that Hindus, a \u2018heroic, intelligent race, had so far lacked proper weapons but were sure to prevail in the forthcoming showdown with demonic anti-Hindus, a broad category that includes Americans (who apparently best exemplify the worldwide \u2018rise of inhumanity\u2019).\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Pankaj Mishra overstates his case. He is a master of hyperbole and tautology. Naipaul is a gifted, poetic writer but guilty as hell about his non-Indianness despite his being of Indian origin. These types have an exaggerated sense of identity with the mother country that often turns into raging hatred and bitterness. To quote Naipaul on world affairs is fine but to quote him on India and Indianness as being the Gospel is like quoting a Dixie fundamentalist preacherman on the Torah or Talmud. His India: A Wounded Civilization was no big shakes\u2014it talked about the Ugly Indian, but so what? There was no depth to it. His House for Mr Biswas, and The Return of Eva Peron were masterpieces but had very little to do with socio-political commentary on India.<\/span><\/p>\n Ironically, the country Modi really admires most is the US (don\u2019t forget who is coming for Republic Day!) because he is a fanatical believer in US-style upward mobility, entrepreneurship, and individual achievement. He also considers America to be a religious nation. He admires Ame-rica\u2019s inventiveness, IT skills, scientific temper and business-like approach to the world. He holds out American post- and pre-Depression rags-to-riches-and-fame stories as examples of his own life. He harbors no bitterness towards the US for denying him a visa following the 2002 Gujarat riots when he was chief minister. Most Gujaratis (Modi is a diehard Gujarati) are naturally inclined to be pro-America. The Gujaratis who live in India as well as the huge Gujarati diaspora in the West and the US are the most powerful pro-American lobby to influence the Indian government. They are wealthy, influential and they drive the Indo-US commercial-business relationship. The Ambani brothers graduated from Wharton and have little time for the RSS khaki-shorts culture.<\/span><\/p>\n
\n
\n His critics come from two directions: The Left (including Rahul Gandhi\u2019s Congress, which has reinvented Socialism) and the Lohiaites, who pretend to stand for the oppressed masses (as against Modi, who supports the super-rich) and want Modi to pay for the sins of Gujarat 2002; and the Right\u2014the RSS swadeshi-wallahs and virulent Hindutva fanatics who preach love jehad and ghar waapasi (reconversion to the Hindu fold), and Ram Mandir rebuilding, and Ramzada versus Haraamzada hard-Right Hindu politics; declare all Indians the children of Ram or, as Sushma Swaraj decrees, want the Bhagwad Gita dec-lared a \u201cnational book\u201d. How many of them have read a word of the Upanishads or the ancient shastras?<\/span><\/p>\n\n
\n celebrations planned by VHP and other Hindutva activists to celebrate December 6 to commemorate the demolition of the Babri Masjid failed to evoke any response in Ayodhya and the town continued its life peacefully and harmoniously.<\/span><\/p>\n