{"id":51195,"date":"2018-07-05T14:33:25","date_gmt":"2018-07-05T09:03:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/?p=51195"},"modified":"2018-07-05T14:36:46","modified_gmt":"2018-07-05T09:06:46","slug":"allotment-sc-lawyer-chamber-kin-challenged","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/constitutional-law-news\/courts-news\/allotment-sc-lawyer-chamber-kin-challenged\/","title":{"rendered":"Allotment of SC lawyer chamber to kin challenged"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Supreme Court bench of Justices A K Sikri and Ashok Bhushan\u00a0<span data-term=\"goog_1822932222\">on Thursday<\/span>\u00a0(July 5) ordered the circulation of a letter seeking termination of a top court \u201ctradition\u201d and rule of giving an advocate\u2019s chamber to his son\/daughter practising in the same court on his death.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Petitioner Vishnu Shankar Jain states that the rule is \u201cpatently discriminatory\u201d and violative of Article 14 in so far it confers a privilege on the basis of descent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The matter will be kept in circulation and will be taken up after a week on a non miscellaneous day for final disposal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400; text-align: right;\"><strong>&#8211;\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0India Legal Bureau<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court bench of Justices A K Sikri and Ashok Bhushan\u00a0on Thursday\u00a0(July 5) ordered the circulation of a letter seeking termination of a top court \u201ctradition\u201d and rule of giving an advocate\u2019s chamber to his son\/daughter practising in the same court on his death. Petitioner Vishnu Shankar Jain states that the rule is \u201cpatently [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":48060,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[246],"tags":[950,20232],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/d2r2ijn7njrktv.cloudfront.net\/IL\/uploads\/2018\/05\/Supreme-Court.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51195"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51195"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51195\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/48060"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51195"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51195"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51195"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}