{"id":55442,"date":"2018-10-09T12:25:58","date_gmt":"2018-10-09T06:55:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/?p=55442"},"modified":"2018-10-09T12:30:49","modified_gmt":"2018-10-09T07:00:49","slug":"sc-declines-early-hearing-petitions-seeking-recall-sabarimala-verdict","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/constitutional-law-news\/supreme-court-news\/sc-declines-early-hearing-petitions-seeking-recall-sabarimala-verdict\/","title":{"rendered":"SC declines early hearing of petitions seeking recall of Sabarimala verdict"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>Above: People of various Hindu organisations staging a protest against the recent Supreme Court order allowing women of all ages to worship at Sabarimala\/Photo: UNI <\/em><\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court on Tuesday (Oct 9) declined early hearing of petitions seeking recall of a Constitution bench judgment allowing entry of women of all ages into the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/topic\/sabarimala-temple\">Sabarimala temple in Kerala<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The judgment was passed by a bench headed by CJI Ranjan Gogoi.<\/p>\n<p>The National Ayyappa Devotee (Women\u2019s) Association, on Monday (October 8), filed a review petition in the apex court challenging the Sabarimala verdict. The plea, filed by Shylaja Vijayan, president of the association, called the apex court\u2019s 4:1 majority judgment \u201cabsolutely untenable and irrational, if not perverse\u201d.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><strong><em>\u2014India Legal Bureau <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Above: People of various Hindu organisations staging a protest against the recent Supreme Court order allowing women of all ages to worship at Sabarimala\/Photo: UNI The Supreme Court on Tuesday (Oct 9) declined early hearing of petitions seeking recall of a Constitution bench judgment allowing entry of women of all ages into the Sabarimala temple [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":55445,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[64],"tags":[950,1707,52480,20232],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/d2r2ijn7njrktv.cloudfront.net\/IL\/uploads\/2018\/10\/09122535\/SC-declines-early-hearing-of-petitions-seeking-recall-of-Sabarimala-verdict.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55442"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=55442"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55442\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/55445"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=55442"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=55442"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=55442"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}