{"id":70492,"date":"2019-08-09T10:15:15","date_gmt":"2019-08-09T04:45:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/?p=70492"},"modified":"2019-08-09T15:07:42","modified_gmt":"2019-08-09T09:37:42","slug":"in-break-from-past-supreme-court-takes-up-ayodhya-matter-on-friday-but-muslim-party-opposes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/constitutional-law-news\/supreme-court-news\/in-break-from-past-supreme-court-takes-up-ayodhya-matter-on-friday-but-muslim-party-opposes\/","title":{"rendered":"In Break From Past, Supreme Court Takes Up Ayodhya Matter On Friday, But Muslim Party Opposes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><div id=\"tdi_1\" class=\"tdc-row\"><div class=\"vc_row tdi_2  wpb_row td-pb-row\" >\n<style scoped>\n\n\/* custom css *\/\n.tdi_2,\r\n                .tdi_2 .tdc-columns{\r\n                    min-height: 0;\r\n                }.tdi_2,\r\n\t\t\t\t.tdi_2 .tdc-columns{\r\n\t\t\t\t    display: block;\r\n\t\t\t\t}.tdi_2 .tdc-columns{\r\n\t\t\t\t    width: 100%;\r\n\t\t\t\t}\n<\/style><div class=\"vc_column tdi_4  wpb_column vc_column_container tdc-column td-pb-span12\">\n<style scoped>\n\n\/* custom css *\/\n.tdi_4{\r\n                    vertical-align: baseline;\r\n                }.tdi_4 > .wpb_wrapper,\r\n\t\t\t\t.tdi_4 > .wpb_wrapper > .tdc-elements{\r\n\t\t\t\t    display: block;\r\n\t\t\t\t}.tdi_4 > .wpb_wrapper > .tdc-elements{\r\n\t\t\t\t    width: 100%;\r\n\t\t\t\t}.tdi_4 > .wpb_wrapper > .vc_row_inner{\r\n\t\t\t\t    width: auto;\r\n\t\t\t\t}.tdi_4 > .wpb_wrapper{\r\n\t\t\t\t    width: auto;\r\n\t\t\t\t    height: auto;\r\n\t\t\t\t}\n<\/style><div class=\"wpb_wrapper\"><div class=\"wpb_wrapper wpb_text_column td_block_wrap td_block_wrap vc_column_text tdi_5  tagdiv-type td-pb-border-top td_block_template_1\"  data-td-block-uid=\"tdi_5\" ><div class=\"td-block-title-wrap\"><\/div><div class=\"td-fix-index\"><p>In a break from the past, the Supreme Court took up the Ayodhya hearing on a Friday, which along with Monday has traditionally been reserved for new cases but a Muslim party objected to it saying the court should not rush through such important hearings.<\/p>\n<p>As a five judge constitution bench headed by the chief justice Ranjan Gogoi took up the hearing on the contentious religious issue for the fourth consecutive day, senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for a Muslim party, raised objection to the five days hearing of the matter. &#8220;It is not possible to assist the court if it is heard on all days of the week. This is the first appeal and the hearing cannot be rushed in this manner and I am put to torture,&#8221; he told the bench, also comprising justices SA Bobde, DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer. The bench told Dhawan that his submissions had been noted and it will revert back to him soon.<\/p>\n<p>At the end of the hearing on Thursday, the CJI had informed the lawyers for both the sides that the matter would be taken up on Friday also. Normally, the apex court registry lists fresh, miscellaneous and after notice cases for hearing before the benches. As per the guidelines followed by Supreme Court, the matters listed before Constitution benches for day-to-day hearings are put up for hearing on three days a week \u2014 Tuesday to Thursday.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><strong><em>\u2014India Legal Bureau<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><div id=\"tdi_6\" class=\"tdc-row\"><div class=\"vc_row tdi_7  wpb_row td-pb-row\" >\n<style scoped>\n\n\/* custom css *\/\n.tdi_7,\r\n                .tdi_7 .tdc-columns{\r\n                    min-height: 0;\r\n                }.tdi_7,\r\n\t\t\t\t.tdi_7 .tdc-columns{\r\n\t\t\t\t    display: block;\r\n\t\t\t\t}.tdi_7 .tdc-columns{\r\n\t\t\t\t    width: 100%;\r\n\t\t\t\t}\n<\/style><div class=\"vc_column tdi_9  wpb_column vc_column_container tdc-column td-pb-span12\">\n<style scoped>\n\n\/* custom css *\/\n.tdi_9{\r\n                    vertical-align: baseline;\r\n                }.tdi_9 > .wpb_wrapper,\r\n\t\t\t\t.tdi_9 > .wpb_wrapper > .tdc-elements{\r\n\t\t\t\t    display: block;\r\n\t\t\t\t}.tdi_9 > .wpb_wrapper > .tdc-elements{\r\n\t\t\t\t    width: 100%;\r\n\t\t\t\t}.tdi_9 > .wpb_wrapper > .vc_row_inner{\r\n\t\t\t\t    width: auto;\r\n\t\t\t\t}.tdi_9 > .wpb_wrapper{\r\n\t\t\t\t    width: auto;\r\n\t\t\t\t    height: auto;\r\n\t\t\t\t}\n<\/style><div class=\"wpb_wrapper\"><div class=\"wpb_wrapper wpb_text_column td_block_wrap td_block_wrap vc_column_text tdi_10  tagdiv-type td-pb-border-top td_block_template_1\"  data-td-block-uid=\"tdi_10\" ><div class=\"td-block-title-wrap\"><\/div><div class=\"td-fix-index\"><h3><strong>You might also be interested in:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"entry-title\"><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/constitutional-law-news\/supreme-court-news\/ayodhya-third-day-hearing-can-ram-janmsthan-also-be-accorded-juristic-person-status-like-ram-lalla-virjaman-asks-sc-70461\">Ayodhya third day hearing: Can Ram Janmsthan also be accorded juristic person status like Ram Lalla Virjaman, asks SC<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/constitutional-law-news\/supreme-court-news\/nirmohi-akhara-continues-arguments-day-2-ayodhya-hearing-70421\">Nirmohi Akhara Continues Arguments on Day 2 Of Ayodhya Hearing<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/constitutional-law-news\/supreme-court-news\/ayodhya-dispute-inner-courtyard-was-always-in-possession-of-nirmohi-akhara-and-outer-courtyard-was-never-a-part-of-dispute-supreme-court-told-70372\">Ayodhya dispute: Inner courtyard was always in possession of Nirmohi Akhara and outer courtyard was never a part of dispute, SC told<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":49385,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[64],"tags":[39774,418,2042,47145,6052,20232],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/d2r2ijn7njrktv.cloudfront.net\/IL\/uploads\/2018\/06\/Ramjanambhoomi-Babri-Masjid-title-dispute-Counsels-argue-over-which-bench-is-to-judge.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70492"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70492"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70492\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/49385"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70492"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70492"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indialegallive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70492"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}