The bench of Chief Justice S.A. Bobde, Justices V. Ramasubramanian and A.S. Bopanna directed the parties to submit their written notes within a week. The day's proceedings began with Senior Advocate Shyam Divan, taking the Supreme Court through the course of events.

The Chief Justice then, giving an example of a Chief Minister who consults with his ministers before a cabinet meeting, questioned Sundaram whether such consultation takes away the independence of the Chief Minister.

On being asked by the parties to submit their objection, Senior Counsel Harish Salve said that he was also a part of the case and had no objection to CJI hearing the case.

Senior Advocate Harish Salve appearing for Tata Sons while resuming his submissions before the bench led by Chief Justice of India SA Bobde said the respondents had challenged Article 86 as an oppressive Article.

Tata Sons has put a spanner in Cyrus Mistry’s attempt to pledge some Tata shares to raise money to urgently repay some outstanding debt. Mistry is a prominent holder of Tata stocks through his family company Shapoorji Pallonji (SP).

Supreme Court restricts Shapoorji Pallonji Mistry Group from raising capital using Tata Sons shares, apex court directs CBSE results of compartment exam as soon as possible, Andhra Pradesh government moves SC against the gag order passed by Andhra Pradesh High Court, Delhi High Court stays Delhi government’s order over reservation of beds in private hospitals for COVID patients

The Supreme Court on Frid...

Tata Sons Private Ltd pre...

The Tata Group has moved ...

Tata Sons is likely to se...