The Meghalaya High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) alleging that the heritage structure of the Pine Mount School, an institution of great history and significance in Shillong has been torn down.
The petition has been filed by one Anuradha Paul , an alumnus of the School.
The grievance of the petitioner is that a heritage structure which has been standing for more than a century and was once used as a hostel for the girl students in the school is suddenly being torn down. Photographs of the standing structure and recent photographs of the demolition having commenced have been appended to the petition. It appears that a single storied old Assam-style building is in the process of being brought down.
“The petitioner does not allege that any rules pertaining to heritage buildings have been infringed. Indeed, the petitioner does not even assert that the relevant building has a heritage tag. There is no doubt that the building has an old-world charm about it as most of old Assam-style buildings did and the few still standing in the city continue to attract”, the Division Bench of Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice B. Bhattacharjee observed.
According to the State, the building was lying disused for several years and better facilities are proposed at the site for boarders. Though the petitioner claims that the school has a lot of additional land where construction work can be undertaken, it does not appear proper that either the petitioner or this Court should have a say in where the owners of the school decide to put up a construction and which other parts they decide to leave open.
It is true that the memories of former students would be lost, but development and progress cannot always be stalled on the basis of sentiments. The demolition of the structure may not appeal to the sensibilities of the petitioner or other former students, but since nothing illegal has been brought to the notice of the Court, the prerogative must rest with the government which owns the school to decide how to fashion, design and style the same , the Bench further observed.
Since the best arguable case of the petitioner does not warrant any inference by the Court in the demolition or reconstruction work undertaken, the Bench dismissed that PIL without prejudice to any other rights that the petitioner may have in accordance with law.