Friday, November 27, 2020
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Plea Filed In SC Seeking Speedy Disposal Of Mercy Petitions & Exhaustion Of Legal Remedies By Death Row Convicts

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking guidelines for disposal of clemency/mercy petitions and exhaustion of legal remedies by death-row- convicts and execution of sentence, in a time-bound manner, for cases in which death penalty have been awarded.

The petition has been filed by Dr.Subhash Vijayran, a practising advocate highlighting the case of the ‘two child-murderer’ sisters Renuka and Seema who have been convicted of kidnapping and murdering, 5 helpless children, whose death sentences though confirmed by the Supreme Court, the President and the Governor has been stayed since 2014, as the Bombay High Court is hearing their post-mercy rejection Writ Petition in the ‘most lackadaisical manner’, since the past 5 years and 7 months.

The petition has submitted that the parents of victims-children are poor-slum dwellers, who have neither the resources nor the reach to approach the authorities in order to awake the Judiciary.

Referring to the recent hanging of Nirbhaya rape convicts, the petitioner has pointed out that there are two glaring deficiencies. Firstly, their execution was biased. They were selectively executed, despite death row convicts charged with more heinous crimes awaiting execution before them. Secondly, the loopholes of our judicial system were exploited to repeatedly postpone hanging for over 3 months.

The petitioner has submitted that “we neither abolish death penalty nor do we execute it fairly and equitably. Even after this Hon’ble Court confirms a death sentence, its execution depends upon the whims and fancies of the government. Firstly, we can’t dispense speedy justice – we have miserably failed at that – and secondly, when justice is indeed dispensed by the courts, albeit lately, we don’t execute the sentence.”

The petitioner has thus urged the Court to direct the Union and the States to dispose, in a time bound manner, the clemency/mercy petitions pending before them and forward their respective recommendations to Union of India, President of India, Governor of State, as the case may be, as per the procedure.

The petitioner has further sought directions to take necessary steps, to execute the sentence of death for those death-row convicts who have exhausted all their legal remedies as laid down by the Supreme  Court in Shabnam v. Union of India.

The petitioner has also sought for a direction to the High Court of Bombay to expediently dispose the writ petition of the two sisters pending before it.

In the alternative the petitioner has sought for declaring the “imposition of death penalty” as unconstitutional on the grounds of “inability” of the state to execute the penalty in a fair, just and equitable manner inter-se the death-row-convicts, the same being violative of Article-14 of the Constitution of India.

-India Legal Bureau

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

News Update

Legal jargon in India

Our legislation, legal p...

Supreme Court rules Arnab will not be arrested till case is on in HC; even in case of adverse order, will not be arrested for 4 more weeks [Read Judgm...

The Supreme Court today reiterated that Republic TV Editor Arnab Goswami will not be arrested till the pendency of proceedings before high court in terms of its November 11 order.

Chhattisgarh High Court rejects petition seeking criminal action against Aamir Khan over his ‘intolerance’ remark

In a big relief for Bollywood's Mr Perfectionist Aamir Khan, the Chhattisgarh High Court has rejected the criminal petition filed against the actor after he made a controversial statement on intolerance in the year 2015.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.