Wednesday, September 22, 2021
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Justice NV Ramana profile: Multi-faceted specialist gets recommendation for India’s top judicial post

Before joining the Supreme Court, Justice Ramana was the Chief Justice of Delhi High Court and the acting Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh High Court.

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

With Chief Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde recommending his name to the Central Government, Justice Nuthalapati Venkata Ramana looks set to be the next Chief Justice of India. Justice N.V. Ramana is the second senior-most Judge of the Supreme Court of India. He is also the Executive Chairman of the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA).

Justice Ramana had recently spoken at an event on the work done by Legal Aid Services authorities during the lockdown. “As a road-map for the future, the Legal Services authorities are focused on developing an accessible mechanism to redress the violation of rights and empowering people through legal services and legal awareness.”

Also Read: Chief Justice SA Bobde recommends Justice NV Ramana as his successor

Before joining the Supreme Court on February 17, 2014, Justice Ramana was the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court and the acting Chief Justice of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. He also served as the president of the Andhra Pradesh Judicial Academy. 

Born in an agricultural family in 1957 in Andhra Pradesh’s Krishna district, Justice Ramana began practicing law in 1983. He has practiced in the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Central and Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunals and the Supreme Court of India in Civil, Criminal, Constitutional, Labour, Service and Election matters. He also functioned as Additional Advocate General of Andhra Pradesh. 

Also Read: Supreme Court dismisses complaint by Andhra CM against Justice Ramana

In 2000, Justice Ramana was appointed as a permanent judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court and in 2013, he was its Acting Chief Justice for two months. He was appointed as the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court in September 2013. He was elevated to the Supreme Court on February 17, 2014. Though Andhra Chief Minister Jagan Mohan Reddy had made allegations against Justice Ramana, the Supreme Court dismissed the said complaint as per in-house procedure.

Justice Ramana has specialized in Constitutional, Criminal, Service and Inter-State River Laws. He is credited with authoring path-breaking judgments in tax, Constitution, arbitration, and criminal law. He was part of a bench that ruled that suspension of the Internet in Jammu and Kashmir should be reviewed immediately. He was also part of the panel of judges, which held that the Chief Justice’s office comes under the ambit of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

There are many notable judgments rendered by Justice Ramana. A few are given below: 


Swaraj Abhiyan Vs Union of India 

Justice Ramana wrote a separate concurring opinion, criticizing the poor implementation of the National Food Security Act, 2013. He criticized the States for failing to appoint a District Level Grievance Officer and the State Food Commission, conduct social audits and establish State Vigilance Committees.

Excel Crop Care Ltd Vs Competition Commission of India 

Justices Ramana and A.K. Sikri settled a critical issue in India’s antitrust jurisprudence. They upheld the principle of ‘relevant turnover’ for determining penalties in competition law contraventions.


Jindal Stainless Steel Vs State of Haryana 

A nine-judge bench upheld the validity of states’ entry tax on goods entering from other states. Justice Ramana was part of the 7-judge majority which held that it is constitutional for states to impose tax on goods imported from other states to protect local goods from undue discrimination.


Adi Saiva Sivachariyargal Nala Sangam Vs Government of Tamil Nadu 

The Supreme Court bench held that the appointment of Archakas in temples must be in accordance with the Agamas (treatises on temple construction, idol installation and deity worship). They also specified that appointments are subject to constitutional principles.

Shreya Vidyarthi Vs Ashok Vidyarthi

The Supreme Court bench held that women cannot become the Karta of a joint family. However, they can be the managers in particular circumstances as the manager’s role is distinct from that of the Karta.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

News Update


Polarisation can only go so far: BJP’s lesson from Bengal on ideology

The Trinamool Congress’ (TMC) post-victory evolution in West Bengal has happened quickly and in Technicolor. The BJP’s former Union minister Babul Supriyo, who had lost all bearing in his party after his defeat, has joined the TMC.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.