Sunday, June 26, 2022

Plea filed in Supreme Court against cartoonist Rachita Taneja for criminal contempt

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

The Supreme Court has been approached by a law student seeking initiation of proceedings for criminal contempt against cartoonist Rachita Taneja for her tweets concerning the top Court. 

In response to a letter written by law student Aditya Kashyap, Attorney General KK Venugopal had recently granted consent to initiate contempt of court proceedings against comic artist Rachita Taneja for a cartoon uploaded on her twitter handle that depicted the BJP, the Apex Court and a reporter along with a caption that read text “Tu JantaNahi Mera Baap Kaun Hai”

The AG had also made note of another tweet that read “Arnab gets bail, real journalists get jail, independent judiciary is fail” along with a picture of Supreme Court with the engraving’ Sanghi Court of India”. The tweet by Taneja had come after the Supreme Court had granted interim bail to journalist Arnab Goswami.

Attorney General Venugopal had stated that the tweet by Taneja implies that the Supreme Court is biased towards the ruling party and he is satisfied that each of the tweets with cartoons attached is in contempt of the Supreme Court of India.

According to Aditya Kashyap, Taneja’s tweets and posts scandalizes the Supreme Court, insinuates and attributes motives behind judgments of the Court clearly violating the line between humour and contempt of court. These posts not only erode the trust in the institution of justice by casting aspersions on the justice delivery mechanism, but also interferes with administration of justice. The tweets and posts are based on distorted facts, inspired by malice, and amount to committing of criminal contempt.

Also ReadCentral Vista: Supreme Court allows foundation stone ceremony, pulls up Centre for going ahead without court ruling

Kashyap’s plea, filed through Advocate Namit Saxena, states that Taneja’s posts in form of cartoons and caricatures have shaken public’s trust and confidence in the judicial system of our constitutional democracy by directly attacking and making insinuations against the Apex Court. The plea has urged the Court to take cognizance of the matter under Section 15(1)(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Rule 3(c) of the Rules to Regulate Proceedings for Contempt of the Supreme Court 1975 and initiate contempt proceedings.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

News Update